A Heaven That Never Began
Why do the heavens last while everything beneath them comes and goes? The answer divides the cosmos into two kinds of nature.
The commentary On the Heavens follows Aristotle in making the heavens a body of their own kind, moving forever in a circle, with nothing contrary to it and so nothing that could make it begin or perish. Below the moon everything is made of earth, water, air and fire, each moving toward its natural place and turning into the others. The commentary on generation and corruption explains such change through matter that persists under changing forms, and against the atomists it denies both indivisible bodies and empty space.
- elements
- generation and corruption
- causation
- natural motion
- cosmology
- natural philosophy
- motion
- matter
- celestial motion
- change
- atomism
- infinity
- eternity
- mixture
- time
- matter and form
- growth
- weight
- ancient philosophy
- void
- potentiality and actuality
Enter a dialogue
- In your commentary On the Heavens, the heavens neither came into being nor will perish. What about their circular motion leads you to that conclusion?
- Earth, water, air and fire turn into one another, in your commentary on generation and corruption. What stays the same when water becomes air?
- Some ancient thinkers explained everything by tiny indivisible bodies moving through empty space. Why do you, with Aristotle, reject both the atoms and the void?
- When two things are truly mixed, each seems to vanish into a new whole. In your commentary on generation and corruption, where have the ingredients gone?
- A stone falls and fire rises, you explain in your commentary On the Heavens, because each has a natural place. What makes a place natural to a body?