A religion that harms, not merely errs
Grant that Christianity is false; is it also bad for those who hold it? Holbach's charge is that it is, training people to fear death and despise this life for a next one no one can show exists.
This was the first of Holbach's books to make the case plainly, and its target is not the truth of Christianity but its effect. The religion, he argues, is not merely mistaken but harmful: it teaches people to fear death, to hold this world cheap for a next one nobody can demonstrate, and so leaves them fearful, obedient and turned against their own happiness. Where the System of Nature would later build the whole materialist philosophy, this book simply indicts, laying out how a faith deforms the character of those raised in it. It went out under a dead engineer's name to keep its author out of prison.
- morality
- ethics
- superstition
- fanaticism
- social control
- religion
- theodicy
- credulity
- religious authority
Enter a dialogue
- A person raised to fear death and judgment carries that dread well into adulthood. What does your account say religion did to them?
- Plenty of believers live decent, unfrightened lives. Isn't your claim that Christianity harms them simply refuted by them?
- How do you separate attacking a religion's harm from attacking whether it is true?
- If a person gives up the hope of heaven, what consolation in the face of death are you asking them to do without?
- You say the faith teaches contempt for this world. Doesn't Christianity also give people meaning and endurance you leave out?