Matter in motion, and nothing else
Is anything real besides matter and its movements? Holbach answers no: nature is matter in motion throughout, and a designing creator is not merely unproven but unneeded to explain any of it.
The book lays out atheism and materialism as a finished system rather than a suspicion. There is one kind of stuff, matter, and one kind of event, motion governed by necessary cause; from these everything follows, with no God required at any point. Order in nature is not evidence of design but of law, and a creator would be a needless addition to a universe already complete in itself. This was bold enough to frighten other unbelievers, Voltaire among them, who wanted no God abolished so absolutely. Condemned by the Paris parlement and burned, it became the great reference-point of eighteenth-century atheism, and carried a dead man's name for years.
- materialism
- nature
- causality
- metaphysics
- naturalism
- atheism
- necessity
- empiricism
Enter a dialogue
- A person looks at the order of the natural world and feels it must have been designed. What in your system answers that feeling?
- Declaring a creator not just unproven but unneeded sounds like certainty dressed as modesty. How do you know nature needs no author?
- How does saying nature runs by necessary law differ from saying it was designed to run that way?
- To accept a universe of matter in motion with no God in it, what hope or meaning does a person have to surrender?
- Even Voltaire recoiled from abolishing God so completely. What did he see as the danger that you thought worth risking?