War Answerable to Its Political Purpose
What is a war for, and who decides how far it goes? Clausewitz's answer is that the fighting takes its measure from the political purpose it serves, never from itself.
War, on this account, continues a state's political dealings by other means, so no campaign can be judged by its own standards. Its measure is the political purpose it serves, and that purpose decides how far the fighting should go. The conduct of war is thereby made answerable to politics rather than to the soldier's craft alone. Clausewitz considered only the first chapter of Book One finished when he sealed the manuscript, yet this is the central claim of all eight books.
- war
- warfare
- military theory
- military strategy
- strategy
- victory
Enter a dialogue
- Doesn't tying war to politics simply hand soldiers' lives over to whatever the politicians happen to want?
- If a victory counts only by the purpose it serves, what becomes of the pride a soldier takes in winning?
- You call war a wonderful trinity: the people's hatred, the general's dealings with chance, the government's reason. Why can none be left out?
- If policy is the intelligence of the state, war takes its character from it. What kind of war does a timid policy produce?
- Napoleon marched on Moscow to force the tsar to peace, as earlier victories had forced other emperors. Why did the whole campaign depend on that hope?