Wealth is measured by what you need
How much is enough? The scattered sayings return again and again to the size of a want, and to the freedom of a person who has learned to need little.
The surviving maxims circle one insight: natural wealth is limited and easily won, while the wealth of empty opinion runs on without end. Nothing satisfies the person for whom enough is too little. Poverty measured against nature's purpose is great riches, and wealth measured against unlimited desire is great poverty. To the fragments, frugality is not privation but the shrewdest calculation, since the taste for luxury, once acquired, becomes a master. A person who fits their wants to what nature actually requires buys a security no fortune can. This is hedonism turned austere, pleasure secured by cutting the appetites that would otherwise devour it.
- desire
- wealth
- frugality
- pleasure
- happiness
- friendship
- pleasure and pain
- atomism
Enter a dialogue
- Telling people to want less can sound like advice for the poor to stay content. Is that not resignation dressed up as wisdom?
- When someone has cultivated a taste for luxury and now cannot do without it, what do you say has happened to their freedom?
- Among your sayings are lines on gratitude. Why would a teacher of wanting little count thanks for what one already has as part of happiness?
- Someone who needs little has little to lose, while someone with a great fortune must guard it. Whose life is really the safer?