Equal Liberty Against Coercion
How far may a state direct a person's life before it violates the freedom it claims to protect? The answer determines whether institutions such as poor relief, public education and sanitary regulation serve justice or impose one person's will on another.
Spencer made equal liberty the test for every political institution: each person may claim the fullest freedom compatible with the like freedom of everyone else. In 1851, eight years before Darwin's Origin of Species, he applied that rule to the poor law, state education, established churches, colonies and public sanitation, rejecting each where compulsion deprived one person of freedom another retained. His later revision in 1892 removed the claim that citizens might ignore the state entirely; Holmes's 1905 dissent showed the rule still had legal force.
- equal freedom
- liberty
- justice
- rights
- political philosophy
- political theory
- natural law
- property rights
- human nature
- adaptation
- ethics
- moral philosophy
- morality
- utilitarianism
Enter a dialogue
- What would you tell someone when public compassion compels one citizen to support another?
- Your rule of equal liberty rejects poor relief: what prevents liberty from becoming indifference?
- When relief depends on compulsion, what must a citizen accept to remain faithful to your rule?
- How would you tell voluntary adaptation from neglect when poverty persists without public assistance?