Mind as Evolved Correspondence
Can the mind be explained as something that grew through life’s adjustments rather than assumed as a starting point? The answer decides whether psychology belongs to natural history—and how innate knowledge should be understood.
Spencer treats mind as a history of adjustments, not a faculty dropped into the body complete. In the 1855 volume, reflex, instinct, memory, reason, and feeling differ by the length and complexity of their correspondence with the external world. Against empiricism and theories of fixed innate forms, he argues that inherited capacities preserve the experience of ancestors in nervous structure. The claim appeared four years before Darwin’s Origin of Species, though its account of inherited acquired experience no longer explains innateness.
- evolution
- biology
- epistemology
- cognition
- adaptation
- psychology
- physiology
- perception
- consciousness
Enter a dialogue
- You test a belief by whether its opposite can be conceived, yet admit that beliefs with inconceivable opposites have proved false. Why keep that test?
- Will arises, you say, when actions grow too complex to run automatically and rival impulses compete until one wins. Is choosing nothing more than that contest?
- A tree will bloom in autumn if the weather turns warm, you note. How do sight and hearing free animals from answering only the present?
- You say no line separates cool reason from passion, since feeling arises with memory and reason. Do a calculation and a fit of anger differ only in degree?