An evil no more permanent than slavery
Is prostitution a fact of human nature or a trade that a city permits? Addams sets it beside slavery, also once called as old as the race, and argues that what public opinion tolerates it can refuse.
Slavery too was blamed on human nature until one generation uprooted it. Addams lines up the parallels: first rules for the traffic, then the rescue of individuals as by the underground railroad, at last abolition. In the way stands the segregated district, where police regulate a trade the law forbids and are paid for it, a source of corruption in every American city. She limits her claim to commercialised vice and expects an irreducible minimum to remain, as murders do. Her hopes rest on physicians, on the vote for women, who would not leave the trade its half-legal protection, and on a single standard of conduct for men and women.
- prostitution
- sexual exploitation
- human trafficking
- social reform
- law enforcement
- state power
- social control
- women's suffrage
- public health
- social stigma
- social responsibility
Enter a dialogue
- Slavery was once said to lie deep in human nature, and within a generation it was abolished. Why should prostitution prove any less removable?
- An 'irreducible minimum' of prostitution will remain in your forecast, as murders remain. If some will always exist, how can it be abolished like slavery?
- Cities confine prostitution to one district and leave the police to manage what the law forbids. Why does that arrangement, on your account, corrupt the police themselves?
- Olga, a penniless seamstress, hides all night from the men pursuing her and is arrested at dawn as a prostitute. What, in your account, failed her?
- You expect women in public life to hold men to the chastity long demanded of women. Why would men's standard rise and not women's fall?