Standing out against a nation at war
Has one person the right to stand out against millions of fellow citizens in wartime? Addams puts the question to herself, admits how near she came to doubting, and describes what the isolation does to a mind.
Newspapers printed pacifist, traitor and pro-German as if they were one word, and a remark of hers about bayonet charges and rum followed her for years. The harder trial was inward. She believed in the judgment of the mass of people, and now they were against her. The leading teachers of pragmatism had come out for the war. The pacifist, she writes, can travel from the mire of self-pity straight to the barren hills of self-righteousness and hate himself in both places. What held in the end was a plain rule: a person's first allegiance is to their vision of the truth, and they are bound to affirm it.
- pacifism
- political dissent
- public opinion
- patriotism
- political repression
- conscription
- moral responsibility
- nationalism
- war
Enter a dialogue
- Soldiers were given rum or ether before a bayonet charge, you reported, and the press heard an insult. What were you really saying about those young men?
- Between the mire of self-pity and the barren hills of self-righteousness lies your map of the wartime pacifist's mind. How does anyone stay out of both?
- All your life you trusted the judgment of ordinary people, and in 1917 they backed the war. Why were the many wrong that one time?
- Someone holds a conviction that their friends, colleagues and newspapers all call disloyal. What did you learn about how long a person can stand that alone?
- War delivered reforms you had long wanted, even votes for women, and you still distrusted them. Why does it matter how a good is won?