Suffering Is No Dream
If pain belongs only to a dream, who is it that suffers, and who could ever wake? Madhva stakes the whole book on the reality of what the soul undergoes.
Against those who call the world an appearance, Madhva turns their proof on itself: an invalid proof that bondage is unreal shows nothing, and a valid one is a real means of knowing beside Brahman, so difference stands. He asks how three grades of reality could ever be established, and finds an ignorance neither real nor unreal as baffling as what it explains. What survives are five real differences: God from souls, God from matter, soul from soul, souls from matter, and one material thing from another.
- difference
- nondualism
- identity and difference
- metaphysics
- consciousness
- soul
- creation
- causation
- dependence
- cosmology
Enter a dialogue
- Those who call suffering unreal must prove it. If their proof is faulty it proves nothing, and if it is sound, why does that undo their own claim?
- Someone lying awake in pain is told the pain is appearance only. Why do you count what they feel as evidence against the teacher?
- Your opponents rank things as absolutely real, practically real or unreal. On which of those three levels does the ranking itself stand?
- The world is blamed on an ignorance said to be neither real nor unreal. Why do you think such an ignorance would leave the self just as inexplicable?
- Some teach that the world comes from nothing. How, in your view, would nothing explain why a thing happens here and now and not elsewhere?