The Torah Is Not a Spade
May a scholar live off the learning he teaches? Maimonides breaks his own resolve to stay silent and answers no, knowing that most rabbis of his day would take offence.
Avot warns against making the Torah a spade to dig with, and Maimonides reads it plainly: learning is not a tool for earning a living. The scholars of his day had read the saying away and set fixed charges on individuals and communities for their own support, teaching people that paying them was a duty. He answers with the sages of the Talmud, Hillel among them, who chopped wood or worked a trade and lived in poverty. A scholar may accept small courtesies, never a salary for his learning.
- torah study
- work
- livelihood
- greed
- charity
- religious authority
Enter a dialogue
- Avot warns against making the Torah a spade to dig with. Why do you read that as forbidding scholars to draw a salary from their learning?
- If scholars may not live from teaching the Torah, who will have the time to teach it well?
- You meant to pass over this saying, knowing your reading would displease most great scholars of the Law. What made you speak after all?
- A gifted student wants to give a whole life to study but must earn a living. What would you advise about work and learning?
- Hillel chopped wood for a living and studied in deep poverty. Why make his poverty, not only his learning, the example for scholars?