PhilosopherNorth Africa

Maimonides

Codifier of the Law who denied God any body

8 works · 1,354 passages grounded

Lifespan
~1138–1204
Also known as
Moses ben Maimon · Rambam
Wikipedia

The mind

Around 1180, in Fustat, the old city beside Cairo, a rabbi who earned his living as a physician completed the Mishneh Torah, a code of Jewish law in fourteen books. He wrote it in Hebrew, left out almost all of his sources, and said in its introduction that a reader who knew the Torah and then this code would need no other book. About ten years later he finished a very different book for a single pupil who had left for Syria. He wrote it in Judaeo-Arabic, Arabic in Hebrew letters, and warned in its introduction that it would contradict itself on purpose. Maimonides, known to Jewish readers as Rambam from the initials of Rabbi Moses ben Maimon, wrote both books, and he held that they taught one truth.

That truth was that the Law of Moses, read rightly, and the philosophy of Aristotle lead to the same God: one with no body, no parts and no description. The Bible gives God a hand, a face and a throne, while the philosophers held that the first cause of all motion can have no body. Maimonides answered that each of Scripture's bodily words about God has a second, figurative sense, and that a true statement about God says only what God does or what God is not. To call God powerful is to deny that he is powerless. In the code he made this law: whoever believes that God has a body and a shape has no share in the world to come.

His family reached Fustat only after years on the move. In 1148 the Almohads, a Berber dynasty that offered non-Muslims conversion, exile or death, took Córdoba, and the family left. They moved through Spain and North Africa, reached Fez in 1160, sailed to Acre in 1165 and settled in Fustat around 1166. How they lived under Almohad rule is uncertain. Ibn al-Qifti, a Muslim historian of the next century, reported that Maimonides had professed Islam in the Maghreb and returned to Judaism in Egypt; historians still dispute the report. The code later set out, as law, when a Jew must die rather than break a commandment and when he must not.

The two books were written for different readers, and the code was for everyone. It begins with God, the angels and the turning spheres of heaven. It identifies these with the secrets the Talmud's rabbis had guarded, then tells every reader, learned or simple, to master the commandments before venturing among those secrets. The Guide for the Perplexed was for the few who had learned philosophy and could no longer take the Bible's words literally. On the question that most divided the philosophers from the Law — whether the world had a beginning — Maimonides argued that neither Aristotle's eternal world nor creation could be proved, and chose creation. Had eternity been proved, he wrote, the verses of Genesis could have been read figuratively, as he had read the verses about God's body.

Both books drew fire in his lifetime and after. Abraham ben David of Posquières, a Provençal rabbi, wrote objections to the code that are still printed beside it, and others feared a code without sources would replace study of the Talmud. Samuel ben Eli, head of the rabbinic academy in Baghdad, charged that Maimonides did not believe in the resurrection of the dead; Maimonides answered in 1191 with his Treatise on Resurrection. In 1232 the rabbis of northern France banned the Guide and the code's first book.

Thomas Aquinas read the Guide in Latin and drew on it. In 1670 Spinoza, in his Theological-Political Treatise, took Maimonides as the leading case of bending Scripture to fit reason, and objected that had reason convinced Maimonides the world was eternal, he would have read Genesis to say so. Maimonides' Thirteen Principles of faith, first set down in his commentary on the Mishnah, are still sung in synagogues in the hymn Yigdal.

Most of this was written in the time left over from medicine. His younger brother David, a merchant in the India trade, drowned in the Indian Ocean carrying money that belonged to both of them and to others. Maimonides wrote years later that he lay ill for about a year afterwards and still mourned him eight years on. From then on he lived by medicine: he served as physician to al-Qadi al-Fadil, Saladin's chief counsellor, and later to the sultan's household, and he wrote medical works as well. In a letter of 1199 he told Samuel ibn Tibbon, his Hebrew translator in Provence, not to expect much of his time: he rode to Cairo every morning, and in the afternoon he came home to rooms full of patients, Jews and gentiles, who kept him until night. He died in Fustat in 1204.

Key concepts

What are the three views of how the world began?

Maimonides sets out three. The Law's: God brought the world into being from nothing, by will, with a first moment. Plato's: God shaped the world out of a matter that always existed. Aristotle's: the world never began, and the heavens have always turned by necessity. None of them, he argued, has been proved, and Plato's view, though unproved, would not overturn the Law as Aristotle's would.

Does God create evil, according to Maimonides?

No. Evil, for Maimonides, is not a thing but an absence, as blindness is the absence of sight and darkness the absence of light, and God makes only what exists. Most of what people call evil they cause one another or themselves, through violence, greed and excess. Only a small share comes from having a body at all, one that can fall ill and die.

Why does Maimonides blame matter for human failings?

Because wrongdoing, for him, comes from the body's matter, not from the mind. The mind is what makes a person human and reaches for knowledge; matter pulls toward food, drink and sex. He reads the seductive woman of Proverbs, waiting at every street corner, as matter luring the mind away from home. The aim is not to hate the body but to give it only what it needs.

What does “necessary existence” mean when it is said of God?

It means existence that cannot fail to be. Everything else exists because something caused it, and might not have existed: a tree needs seed, soil and rain. God's existence depends on nothing, so for God not to exist is impossible. Maimonides took the idea from the philosophers' proofs and argued that such a being can have no body, no parts and nothing added to it.

Themes of the Mind

Concepts that recur together across the corpus held here, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of this philosopher's writing each one occupies.

Moses and Aristotle, One Truth

Can a believer who has learned philosophy keep both the Bible and the proofs? The wager here is that the Law, read rightly, and Aristotle lead to the same God.

Where Scripture and demonstration seem to clash, Maimonides rereads the verse, never the proof: the Torah, the rabbis said, speaks in the language of human beings, so a word may carry a second, figurative sense. Yet he would not bend every verse. Aristotle had not proved the world eternal, so Genesis keeps its plain sense; had a proof existed, he wrote, Genesis could have been read figuratively too. Spinoza later called this bending Scripture to fit reason, and the charge has followed the method ever since.

  • scriptural interpretation
  • biblical interpretation
  • hermeneutics
  • metaphor
  • figurative language
  • Aristotle
  • creation
  • eternity of the universe
  • demonstration
  • reason
  • revelation

A God Without Body or Description

What may anyone truly say about God? Almost nothing positive, and the warning is meant for every believer, not only for philosophers.

The Bible's hand, face and throne are figures, and the only true statements about God say what God does or what God is not: to call God powerful is to deny that he is powerless. Maimonides made this law rather than opinion. Whoever believes God has a body and a shape has no share in the world to come, and incorporeality must be taught to children and the simple just as they are taught that God is one. Picturing God wrongly, he argued, is worse than worshipping idols.

  • divine attributes
  • divine incorporeality
  • divine simplicity
  • divine unity
  • negative theology
  • anthropomorphism
  • idolatry
  • divine names
  • religious language

Knowing God as the Highest Good

What is a human being finally for? Not wealth, health or even good character, but a mind that comes to know God.

Maimonides ranked four perfections: possessions, the body, good character and, highest, true knowledge of God, the only one worth glorying in. Much of the system bends toward it. Love of God grows only as knowledge grows, by looking closely at the stars and living things. Prophecy is a trained intellect joined to a strong imagination. Providence watches most closely over those who know God best. And the world to come is a life of the mind without a body, which is why the code warns against serving God for the reward.

  • intellect
  • knowledge of god
  • human perfection
  • love of god
  • prophecy
  • imagination
  • divine providence
  • afterlife
  • immortality
  • wisdom

A Law That Heals Character

Why should a law tell people how to feel, eat and speak? For this physician, every commandment has a reason, and most of them train the soul toward health.

Maimonides denied that the commandments are arbitrary decrees, and the Guide gives reasons even for the sacrifices, read as a concession to a people used to them. In the Eight Chapters a bad trait is a sickness of the soul, cured by leaning for a while toward its opposite. The code then makes the middle path a commandment, with two exceptions, pride and anger, which must be fled to the far end. The body's health belongs to the same service, since nobody learns about God while sick or hungry.

  • religious law
  • commandments
  • divine law
  • virtue ethics
  • virtue
  • moderation
  • moral education
  • moral psychology
  • health
  • humility
  • sacrifice

Free to Turn Back

If God knows what someone will do, is the choice still theirs? It must be, or the whole Law, and repentance with it, would be pointless.

Anyone, Maimonides held, can become as righteous as Moses or as wicked as Jeroboam; no decree, no star at birth and no inborn temperament settles it. Against the astrologers he argued that a fixed fate would make commandment, reward and punishment meaningless. Repentance rests on the same freedom, and it is complete when the old temptation returns with its full force and the person walks away. He conceded that no human mind can see how God's foreknowledge and free choice fit together, and held on to both.

  • free will
  • repentance
  • moral responsibility
  • divine knowledge
  • reward and punishment
  • sin
  • atonement
  • punishment
  • divine justice

Writing for the Few and the Many

How should one truth be taught to readers with very different minds? The answer split the work into a code for everyone and a guarded book for the few.

The code speaks plainly and tells every reader, learned or simple, to master the commandments before entering the secrets the rabbis guarded, which Maimonides identified with physics and metaphysics. The Guide, written for one pupil, warns that it will contradict itself on purpose, so that only a prepared reader follows it. Rewards are promised to the many as nuts and figs are promised to a child, until they learn to love learning for itself. The Thirteen Principles gave even the simplest believer a creed to hold.

  • education
  • pedagogy
  • esoteric knowledge
  • esotericism
  • religious education
  • religious belief
  • religious authority
  • allegory
  • symbolism

By the numbers

works held
8
passages traced
1,354
concepts traced
1,064
thematic clusters
5

Concepts that travel together

The wheel takes the leading concepts of these writings and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “free will” and “moral responsibility”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 7 concepts, joined by 20 pairings. 97 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
free willmoral responsibility22
free willrepentance14
moral responsibilityrepentance10
afterlifereligious law4
free willprophecy4
moral responsibilityreligious law4
afterliferepentance3
prophecyreligious law3
prophecyrepentance3
religious lawvirtue ethics3
free willreligious law2
free willvirtue ethics2
moral responsibilityvirtue ethics2
religious lawrepentance2
afterlifefree will1
afterlifemoral responsibility1
afterlifeprophecy1
afterlifevirtue ethics1
moral responsibilityprophecy1
prophecyvirtue ethics1

The arc of a career

A cell's weight is that concept's share of the work's passages, so a column can be read downwards as well as a row across. Densest: logic in Treatise on Logic, 55.6%.

Density 0% 55.6%

Concept density per work, chronological 8 works, in the order they were written. 8 concept columns, ranked by total weight. 83 further concepts fall outside the columns shown.
WorkYearvirtue ethicsprophecyrepentancefree willreligious lawlogicafterlifemoral responsibility
Commentary on the Mishnah: Tractate Sanhedrin2.3%4.6%1.1%0%21.8%0%14.9%0%
The Commentary to Mishnah Aboth31.5%0%5.5%4.1%5.5%0%8.2%4.1%
Eight Chapters on Ethics37.1%11.3%9.7%29%6.5%0%0%17.7%
Mishneh Torah: Foundations of the Torah0%41.5%1.9%0%13.2%0%0%1.9%
Mishneh Torah: Human Dispositions27.5%0%0%0%0%0%0%2.5%
Mishneh Torah: Repentance0%5.8%51.9%25%5.8%0%26.9%23.1%
The Guide for the Perplexed0.4%14.9%1.1%1.2%4.4%0.2%0.5%0.9%
Treatise on Logic0%0%0%0%0%55.6%0%0%

Works held

Titles in your language, the original beneath in brackets; “lit.” marks our own translation where no English edition exists. Side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. Commentary on the Mishnah: Tractate Sanhedrin (Kitāb al-Sirāj: Sanhedrin)

    One tractate of Maimonides' first great book, the Commentary on the Mishnah, including the introduction to Perek Helek in which the Thirteen Principles first appear; held in the medieval Hebrew translation printed in the Vilna Talmud.

    HE
  2. Eight Chapters on Ethics (Shemonah Perakim)

    Maimonides' ethics set out in eight chapters, opening his commentary on the tractate Avot in 1168; the Mishneh Torah's laws of character later restate its doctrine of the mean as law. Held in Joseph Gorfinkle's English of 1912.

    EN
  3. Mishneh Torah: Foundations of the Torah (Mishneh Torah: Hilkhot Yesodei ha-Torah)

    Where the Mishneh Torah begins: Hilkhot Yesodei ha-Torah, the opening section of its first book, the Book of Knowledge (Sefer ha-Madda); held alone, its ten chapters in Simon Glazer's English of 1927.

    EN
  4. Mishneh Torah: Human Dispositions (Mishneh Torah: Hilkhot De'ot)

    The second of the five sections of the Book of Knowledge, between the Foundations of the Torah and the laws of Torah study; held alone, its seven chapters in Simon Glazer's English of 1927.

    EN
  5. Mishneh Torah: Repentance (Mishneh Torah: Hilkhot Teshuvah)

    Closing the Mishneh Torah's first book, the Book of Knowledge, Hilkhot Teshuvah is the last of its five sections; held alone, its ten chapters in Simon Glazer's English of 1927.

    EN
  6. The Commentary to Mishnah Aboth (Kitāb al-Sirāj: Avot)

    Maimonides' commentary on the five chapters of Avot, written within the Commentary on the Mishnah and opened by the Eight Chapters, which have their own page here; held in Samuel ibn Tibbon's medieval Hebrew.

    HE
  7. The Guide for the Perplexed (Dalālat al-Ḥāʾirīn)

    Maimonides' last major book, addressed to a single reader and completed in Fustat around 1190, a decade after the Mishneh Torah had made his name. Held here in Michael Friedländer's English of 1904, with the letter to Joseph.

    EN
  8. Treatise on Logic (Maqāla fī ṣināʿat al-manṭiq)

    Traditionally the earliest of Maimonides' writings; held in Moses ibn Tibbon's Hebrew, all fourteen chapters, from a Warsaw printing of 1928.

    HE
Begin a dialogue with Maimonides

— or wander to another mind

Set two minds against each other

Each of these is a question the two of them answer differently. Choose one and they argue it out, both drawing on the texts held here.