An empress and her experimenters
What should a ruler do with learned men whose instruments make them disagree? The fiction gives the question to an empress with the power to break every glass in her world.
Once on the throne, the Empress sorts her half-animal subjects into learned societies and questions each in turn. The Bear-men, her experimental philosophers, look at the stars through telescopes and cannot agree what they see, so she calls the glasses false informers and orders them broken. They kneel and beg to keep them, confessing that they take more delight in artificial delusions than in natural truths, and she relents. Later the Duchess advises dissolving the societies altogether, because wherever learning is there is quarrelling, and a quiet government matters more than their reports.
- natural philosophy
- scientific instruments
- scientific disagreement
- technology
- knowledge
- epistemology
- education
- reason
Enter a dialogue
- Your Empress orders the telescopes broken when her Bear-men, the experimenters of her world, cannot agree what they see. Why blame the instrument for the observers' quarrel?
- The Empress's experimenters beg to keep their glasses, confessing they enjoy artificial delusions more than natural truths. Why do you let her give in?
- Bear-men do the experiments, Bird-men the astronomy, and parrots and magpies the oratory and logic. What were you saying about each science by giving it to an animal?
- As the Duchess in the story, you advise dissolving every learned society, since wherever learning is there is quarrelling. Is a quiet state worth more than knowledge?
- Someone trusts a measurement because an instrument produced it. What would your Empress, who calls telescopes false informers, ask that person first?