Trusting one's own mind
Why should a private conviction outweigh a church, a party or a neighbour's opinion? Emerson's answer is that the inmost thought, trusted fully, turns out to be everyone's.
Self-reliance, in these essays, is not stubbornness. Emerson's ground for it is the Over-Soul, the one mind every person shares, so that what is true in a private heart is true for all, and speaking it is what he calls genius. Conformity is the enemy, and so is loyalty to one's own past words: a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds. The same confidence shapes his reading of the past, which holds that there is no history, only biography, since every age can be read out of one mind.
- self-reliance
- authenticity
- individualism
- individuality
- social conformity
- intuition
- soul
- self-knowledge
- truth
- knowledge
- history
- religion
- genius
- transcendence
Enter a dialogue
- "Whoso would be a man must be a nonconformist," runs your essay on self-reliance. Is refusing to fit in a virtue, or only a method for finding one?
- Someone has said one thing in public for years and now sees it differently. Why does it take courage, in your view, simply to contradict yourself today?
- In great books we meet our own rejected thoughts, returning with a borrowed majesty. Why do people dismiss their best ideas until a famous name says them?
- Asked to care for distant slaves, you answer that love far away can be spite at home. Where does self-trust end and plain indifference begin?
- Your essay on history claims there is properly no history, only biography. What can a person learn about Rome or Egypt by reading their own mind?