Who buys the growing surplus
If more is produced each year than the year before, someone has to buy the difference. Luxemburg looks for that buyer in Marx's own tables and does not find one.
Marx's growth tables contain two classes. Workers can spend only their wages, which the capitalists have advanced to them. Capitalists who consumed the whole surplus would not be accumulating. That leaves the idea that industry buys from itself, more machines to make more machines, which Luxemburg calls a merry-go-round turning in empty air, since nobody invests without a final customer in view. The middle of the book follows the question through a century of disputes, from Sismondi against Ricardo to the Russian economists of the 1890s. Her verdict is that the sums come out because paper accepts any equation, and that Marx posed the problem without solving it.
- capital accumulation
- social reproduction
- surplus value
- effective demand
- consumption
- overproduction
- economic modeling
- simple reproduction
- markets
- reproduction
- marxism
Enter a dialogue
- Marx's tables show a society of only capitalists and workers growing every year. Why can neither class, on your reckoning, buy the growing surplus?
- Building more machines only to build still more machines is, for you, a merry-go-round turning in empty air. Why would no capitalist invest on those terms?
- Paper, you remark, patiently accepts any equation, so Marx's sums come out smoothly. What does the arithmetic leave out that real accumulation cannot do without?
- Marx left the second volume of Capital unfinished. Why do you treat his growth tables as an open question rather than as his solution?