RevolutionaryGermany

Rosa Luxemburg

The revolutionary who demanded freedom for dissenters

10 works · 4,196 passages grounded

Lifespan
1871–1919
School
Marxism
Wikipedia

The mind

Between 1898 and 1904 two socialists who agreed on almost nothing received the same objection from the same critic. Eduard Bernstein, a senior German Social Democrat, had argued that capitalism was not heading for collapse and that his party should settle for reform through trade unions and parliament. Lenin, who led one side of the divided Russian Social Democrats, wanted a party whose central committee would form the local committees and direct their work. Rosa Luxemburg answered Bernstein in Reform or Revolution (1899) and Lenin in the article "Organizational Questions of Russian Social Democracy" (1904). Each man, she argued, had put someone else in the place of the workers: deputies and union officials in the first case, a committee in the second. Socialism can be made only by the mass of working people themselves, who learn how to do it by acting, and no parliament or party leadership can do it on their behalf.

She grew up in Warsaw, in a Jewish family in the part of Poland that Russia ruled. In 1889, threatened with arrest for her politics, she was smuggled over the border and went to Zürich, where she took a doctorate in 1897 with a thesis on the industrial development of Poland. Polish industry had grown into the Russian market, she argued, so an independent Poland was no aim for socialists, and the Polish party she had helped to found in 1893 refused to demand one. In April 1898 she married a German, Gustav Lübeck, to obtain his citizenship. In May she moved to Berlin and joined the Social Democratic Party, and by September she was writing against Bernstein.

Events in Russia then gave her evidence that workers learn by acting. In December 1905 she went to Warsaw to take part in the revolution that had spread across the Russian empire that year; she was arrested in March 1906 and held into the summer. The Mass Strike, the Political Party and the Trade Unions (1906) sets out what she had learned. The strikes had not been planned by anyone. Workers who belonged to no union struck first and built their unions afterwards, and strikes over wages kept turning into strikes against the government. Organisation, she concluded, grows out of the struggle, and a party can neither order a mass strike nor forbid one. The German party decided otherwise. Its congress at Mannheim in September 1906 agreed to call no mass strike without the trade unions, and in 1910 the same dispute ended her alliance with Karl Kautsky, the party's leading theorist.

From 1907 she taught economics at the party's school in Berlin, and a difficulty she met while writing up her lectures became The Accumulation of Capital (1913). Marx had drawn up tables in which a society of capitalists and workers grows year after year, and Luxemburg asked who buys the growing surplus of goods. Her answer was that the buyers must come from outside capitalism, from peasants, craftsmen and colonies, and that capital destroys these economies as it absorbs them. Imperialism, on this account, is the way growth continues, and it has a limit because the outside world is finite.

On 4 August 1914 the Social Democratic deputies voted for the credits that paid for Germany's war. Luxemburg spent most of the war in prison: a year in Berlin from February 1915 for an anti-war speech, then, from July 1916 to 9 November 1918, detention without trial in the fortress at Wronke and in Breslau. In the Berlin prison she wrote the Junius Pamphlet (1916), published in English as The Crisis in the German Social-Democracy. It told her party that society must either go forward to socialism or fall back into barbarism, and that the war was the falling back.

In Breslau, in the autumn of 1918, she wrote The Russian Revolution, an unfinished manuscript that defends Lenin's party for taking power and criticises it for dissolving the elected assembly and restricting the vote, the press and the right of assembly. This was her objection of 1904, now addressed to a government. Socialism cannot be introduced by decree, she argued, because no one holds the plan in advance. It has to be learned in open public life, and so freedom must be the freedom of the person who thinks differently.

Her group, which had taken the name Spartacus in 1916, helped to found the Communist Party of Germany at the end of December 1918. At the founding congress she argued that the party should stand in the national elections, and lost the vote, 62 to 23. Two weeks later government troops put down a rising in Berlin. On 15 January 1919 she and Karl Liebknecht, who led the Spartacus group with her, were arrested and handed to soldiers of a cavalry division, who killed them both.

Paul Levi, her lawyer, printed the Russian manuscript in 1922, and Lenin replied that year by listing her errors and calling her, in spite of them, an eagle. In 1925 Grigory Zinoviev, who chaired the Communist International, called for a campaign against "Luxemburgism". In 1988 East Germany arrested opposition activists who quoted her sentence on freedom at a demonstration. The Accumulation of Capital had been rejected by almost all its socialist reviewers, and by Lenin. But its English translation of 1951 carried an introduction by the Cambridge economist Joan Robinson.

Key concepts

What does Luxemburg mean by spontaneity?

Spontaneity is action that working people begin themselves, without a plan or an order from any leadership. Her example is the strike at Rostov-on-Don, which broke out unprompted, with speeches improvised in the street, while the party came along behind. She does not conclude that a party is useless. Its job is to explain where the movement is heading and to give it political direction, which is a different thing from commanding it.

What is a mass strike, in Luxemburg's sense?

A mass strike, for Luxemburg, is a whole period of struggle and no single stoppage called for a set day. In Russia in 1905 strikes over wages, protest strikes and street demonstrations followed one another for months, each setting off the next, with economic demands turning political and back again. So she denies that it is a tool a party takes out or puts away. It is the form a revolution takes once millions of workers are in motion.

What does Luxemburg mean by imperialism?

Imperialism is, for her, the race between capitalist states for the parts of the world that are not yet capitalist. Capital, she argues, can sell its growing surplus only to buyers outside itself, peasants and colonies, and so must keep opening such regions with loans, railways and force. Her cases include the opium wars against China and the loans that ended in the British occupation of Egypt. Because those regions are finite, the race sharpens into armament and war.

What does the phrase 'socialism or barbarism' mean?

It means that capitalism will not grow peacefully into something better: society either goes forward to socialism or falls back into barbarism. Luxemburg credits the phrase to Engels and says that only the world war showed what falling back looks like, with cities turned to rubble and millions dead among the workers who could have built a new society. Nothing guarantees the better outcome. It depends on whether working people act.

What is the dictatorship of the proletariat for Luxemburg?

It is rule by the working class as a whole, never by one party or a small group in its name. Luxemburg accepts that a workers' government must act forcefully against the owners' property. But it must do so in public, with elections, a free press and the mass of the people taking part, which she calls unlimited democracy. A handful of politicians governing on the workers' behalf is, for her, the rule of a clique.

Themes of the Mind

Concepts that recur together across the corpus held here, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of this philosopher's writing each one occupies.

Socialism made by the workers themselves

Who makes a revolution: the people it is for, or those who lead them? Luxemburg held that no committee and no parliament can act in the workers' place, because people learn to run a society only by doing it.

Lenin wanted a central committee able to form the local committees and direct their work. Luxemburg answered in 1904 that such a centre would be good at supervision and at little else, and compared its spirit to a night-watchman's. The tactics that had carried the Russian movement forward had been found in the struggle itself, and the leaders had followed. Obedience drilled in the factory and the barracks was the habit to be broken. Hence her sharpest sentence: the mistakes of a truly revolutionary workers' movement are more fruitful than the infallibility of the best central committee.

  • political organization
  • working class
  • proletariat
  • labor movement
  • class struggle

The mass strike: struggle first, organisation after

Can a party schedule a revolution the way it schedules a meeting? From the Russian strikes of 1905 Luxemburg concluded that a mass strike can be neither ordered nor forbidden, and that whoever waits until everyone is organised will wait for ever.

Advocates and opponents of the mass strike in Germany pictured it alike as a pocket knife, kept folded for emergencies and opened by resolution. Russia in 1905 showed her a different thing. Strikes over wages turned into strikes against the government and back again, nobody had planned them, and workers who belonged to no union struck first and founded their unions afterwards. Organisation, on her reading, is a product of the struggle. The party's task is to give the movement political direction once it comes. The Mannheim congress of 1906 decided otherwise.

  • mass strike
  • trade unions
  • political strategy

Reform, parliament and the final goal

Does a party that wins one improvement after another arrive at socialism in the end? Luxemburg's answer is that reforms are worth fighting for and lead somewhere else once the aim of taking political power is dropped.

Eduard Bernstein had told the Social Democrats that the movement was everything and the final goal nothing. Luxemburg never opposed the daily work: unions defend wages, and parliament is a platform from which to speak to the country. Her point concerned limits. She called union work a labour of Sisyphus, necessary and never finished, since no law removes the need that drives people to work for wages. A socialist who joins a non-socialist cabinet, as Alexandre Millerand did in France, ends by defending it. In 1910 the same quarrel divided her from Karl Kautsky, who advised waiting for the next elections.

  • social democracy
  • parliamentary politics
  • socialism
  • marxism

Why capital needs a world outside itself

If a society consisted only of capitalists and workers, who would buy its ever-growing surplus of goods? Luxemburg's answer makes colonial conquest a condition of growth and sets that growth a limit.

Marx's tables showed such a closed society expanding year after year. Luxemburg objected that workers can spend only their wages, and that capitalists who consumed the whole surplus themselves would not be accumulating. The buyers, she argued, must be peasants, craftsmen and colonies, economies not yet capitalist, which capital needs as markets and destroys as it absorbs them. British India, French Algeria and the opium wars are her cases. Capitalism is thus the first economic form that strives to cover the globe and the first that cannot exist alone. Almost every socialist reviewer rejected the argument, and so did Lenin.

  • capitalism
  • capital accumulation
  • surplus value
  • social reproduction
  • political economy
  • colonialism
  • labor

Socialism or barbarism: war and the nation

What should workers do when their own country goes to war and calls it defence? In an age of empires, Luxemburg held, the defence of the nation is the cover under which conquest is carried on.

On 4 August 1914 the Social Democratic deputies voted for Germany's war credits, and she wrote her reckoning in prison. Twenty years of naval building and colonial rivalry, she argued, showed that every great power had prepared this war. Society faced a choice she credited to Engels: forward to socialism or back into barbarism, and the war was the falling back. Wars, she had told a Frankfurt court that February, last only as long as working people join in or put up with them. She had long refused national independence as a socialist aim, Poland's included, and in 1918 called the right of nations to self-determination a hollow phrase.

  • war
  • militarism
  • imperialism
  • nationalism
  • internationalism

Freedom for the one who thinks differently

May a revolution suspend elections and a free press until it is safe? Luxemburg defended the Bolsheviks for taking power and told them that socialism without an open public life dies from within.

Nobody holds the plan of a socialist society ready in advance, she wrote in 1918, and so it cannot be introduced by decree. Tearing down can be decreed and building up cannot, because only experience corrects mistakes and opens new ways, and experience needs elections, a free press and open debate. Without them life drains out of the soviets, a few dozen party leaders rule, and the bureaucracy is the only part still active. She did not reject a dictatorship of the working class. She wanted the class itself to exercise it, in full public view, and not a handful of politicians in its name.

  • democracy
  • political power
  • revolution

By the numbers

works held
10
passages traced
4,196
concepts traced
1,991
thematic clusters
6

Concepts that travel together

The wheel takes the leading concepts of these writings and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “class struggle” and “socialism”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 27 pairings. 84 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
class strugglesocialism93
class strugglerevolution90
capitalismimperialism59
mass strikesrevolution58
capitalismsocialism54
class strugglesocial democracy49
capitalismclass struggle47
class strugglemass strikes44
revolutionsocialism44
class strugglepolitical organization33
class struggleimperialism30
imperialismsocialism30
revolutionsocial democracy25
imperialismrevolution22
capitalismrevolution21
political organizationrevolution17
political organizationsocial democracy15
capitalismsocial democracy14
imperialismsocial democracy14
mass strikespolitical organization14
mass strikessocial democracy8
political organizationsocialism8
capitalismmass strikes7
imperialismpolitical organization4
mass strikessocialism4
social democracysocialism4
imperialismmass strikes2

The arc of a career

A cell's weight is that concept's share of the work's passages, so a column can be read downwards as well as a row across. Densest: political organization in Organizational Questions of Russian Social Democracy, 47.9%.

Density 0% 47.9%

Concept density per work, chronological 10 works, in the order they were written. 8 concept columns, ranked by total weight. 80 further concepts fall outside the columns shown.
WorkYearrevolutionclass strugglecapitalismsocialismpolitical organizationimperialismsocial democracymass strikes
Reform or Revolution13.1%11.5%43.2%22.4%0%1.1%4.4%0%
Organizational Questions of Russian Social Democracy6.3%22.9%0%2.1%47.9%0%12.5%0%
Socialism and the Churches0%8.5%10.2%30.5%1.7%0%0%0%
The Mass Strike, the Political Party and the Trade Unions32.2%19.9%4.1%0%10.5%0%16.4%43.3%
The Accumulation of Capital0.3%0.3%17.1%1.5%0%5.8%0%0%
The Crisis in the German Social-Democracy (The “Junius” Pamphlet)11.2%15.3%14.9%9.2%2.4%43.4%16.5%0.4%
Aufsätze und Artikel12.6%17.2%8.7%17.3%4.4%7.3%7.6%6.5%
Reden13.2%16.8%8.2%13.2%3.6%4.2%6.7%11.9%
The Russian Revolution37.3%8%1.3%21.3%0%5.3%0%0%
Introduction to Political Economy1.6%2.1%14.3%3.1%0.2%1%0.5%0%

Works held

Titles in your language, the original beneath in brackets; “lit.” marks our own translation where no English edition exists. Side chips show which full texts are held.

EARLY — POLAND & THE REVISIONISM DISPUTE

  1. 1899 Reform or Revolution (Sozialreform oder Revolution?)

    Within a year of her arrival in Berlin she had written the newspaper articles gathered here. Their case about where reform stops is the ground she argues from in everything later.

    DE
  2. 1904 Organizational Questions of Russian Social Democracy (Organisationsfragen der russischen Sozialdemokratie)

    Written against Lenin's plan for a party, this is her sustained piece on how one should be organised. The prison manuscript on the Russian Revolution took the argument up again fourteen years later.

    DE

THE REVOLUTION OF 1905 — MASS STRIKE

  1. 1905 Socialism and the Churches (Kościół a socjalizm)

    The Polish side of her work: a pamphlet for the party she helped to lead in Russian Poland, written in the revolutionary year that she analysed afterwards in The Mass Strike.

    DE
  2. 1906 The Mass Strike, the Political Party and the Trade Unions (Massenstreik, Partei und Gewerkschaften)

    The fullest statement of her view that mass action cannot be scheduled by leaders. The dispute it opened with the trade unions came back in 1910 as her break with Karl Kautsky, the party's leading theorist.

    DE

PARTY SCHOOL — POLITICAL ECONOMY & IMPERIALISM

  1. 1913 The Accumulation of Capital (Die Akkumulation des Kapitals)

    Among pamphlets and articles, this is the one full-length treatise she finished. It supplies the economic basis for the account of war she gave three years later in the Junius Pamphlet.

    DE

WAR, PRISON & REVOLUTION

  1. 1916 The Crisis in the German Social-Democracy (The “Junius” Pamphlet) (Die Krise der Sozialdemokratie)

    The account of imperialism from The Accumulation of Capital, applied three years later to an actual war and to the party that had voted for it.

    DE
  2. 1919 lit. Essays and Articles Aufsätze und Artikel

    Newspaper and journal pieces from 1893 to 1919, the running record beside the books. They include the 1910 polemics against Karl Kautsky and her last articles for Die Rote Fahne.

    DE
  3. 1919 lit. Speeches Reden

    What she said aloud, on the questions her articles and pamphlets argue in print, from her first months in Germany in 1898 to the last weeks of her life.

    DE
  1. 1922 The Russian Revolution (Die russische Revolution)

    She left it unfinished in Breslau prison in 1918, and Paul Levi printed it four years later. It returns to the objection she had made to Lenin in 1904, now that his party held a state.

    DE
  2. 1925 Introduction to Political Economy (Einführung in die Nationalökonomie)

    Her economics as she taught it: plainer than The Accumulation of Capital, which grew out of it, and the place where her reading on communal societies before capitalism is set out.

    DE
Begin a dialogue with Rosa Luxemburg

— or wander to another mind

Set two minds against each other

Each of these is a question the two of them answer differently. Choose one and they argue it out, both drawing on the texts held here.