WriterRussia

Leo Tolstoy

The novelist who took the Sermon on the Mount at its word

10 works · 6,196 passages grounded

Lifespan
1828–1910
School
Anarchism
Also known as
Leo Tolstoi · Lev Tolstoy · Lew Tolstoi
Wikipedia

The mind

In February 1901 the Holy Synod, the governing body of the Russian Orthodox Church, decreed that the church no longer counted Count Leo Tolstoy as a member and would not until he repented. The man it shut out had written War and Peace and Anna Karenina. In April he replied that the decree was correct: he had renounced the church in order to serve God better. By then he had spent twenty years arguing a single claim. Jesus meant exactly what he said in the Sermon on the Mount, and when he told his hearers not to resist evil, he ruled out violence of every kind, including the armies, courts, prisons and executions on which every state depends.

The claim grew out of a crisis. At the end of the 1870s Tolstoy was nearing fifty, with a loving wife, children, large estates and both great novels behind him, and he could not answer one question: what would come of any of it? He took a cord out of his room so that he would not hang himself from a beam. Philosophy gave him no help: Schopenhauer, the German pessimist he had read with delight ten years earlier, now seemed only to confirm that life had no meaning. What brought him back was the example of the peasants around him, who lived and died without being tormented by the question. In A Confession he concluded that faith is not agreement with what one has been told but knowledge of what life means — the knowledge that lets a person go on living.

One conviction was older than the crisis. In Paris in 1857 he watched a man guillotined, and he wrote later that the sight showed him no theory of progress could justify such an act: the judge of what is good was neither public opinion nor progress but his own heart. That rule, to trust a plain moral perception over any system that explains it away, runs through what he wrote after the crisis. He went back to the Greek text of the Gospels to learn what Jesus had taught, setting aside what the church said about it, and came to deny that Jesus was God. In The Kingdom of God Is Within You (1893) he drew the political conclusion: government rests on force, so anyone who takes the teaching as a way of life can take no part in it.

The Doukhobors, a pacifist sect, were persecuted after they burned their weapons in 1895. When they were allowed to leave Russia, Tolstoy gave the royalties from his novel Resurrection to pay about a third of the cost of their emigration, and some 7,500 of them reached Canada in 1899. Most of his religious books were banned at home. They appeared in Geneva, Paris and England and passed through Russia in handwritten copies, and the censors called The Kingdom of God Is Within You the most harmful book they had ever banned.

The book's best-known reader found it abroad: in 1894 Mohandas Gandhi, then a young lawyer in South Africa, read it in English and credited it with making him a lasting believer in non-violence. Tolstoy's ideas on non-violent resistance later reached Martin Luther King Jr., the American civil-rights leader, largely through Gandhi. In 1895 the Russian physician Maria Manaseina answered the book by calling its programme passive anarchy. In 1914 the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein, then a volunteer in the Austro-Hungarian army, bought Tolstoy's The Gospel in Brief at a bookshop in Tarnów and carried it everywhere; his comrades called him the man with the Gospels. Isaiah Berlin, the Oxford historian of ideas, argued in 1951 that Tolstoy's gift was for seeing the world in countless separate particulars, while his conviction was that one ought to see it through a single idea.

In May 1908, at seventy-nine, he read that peasants had been hanged at Kherson and wrote the article "I Cannot Be Silent", arguing that the hangings were carried out in his name. That July every Russian newspaper that printed excerpts from it was fined. Late in October 1910 he left his estate, Yasnaya Polyana, secretly at night. He caught pneumonia on the journey and died at Astapovo, a small railway station, ten days after leaving home.

Key concepts

What is the law of love in Tolstoy's thought?

It is the single law of life he found in the teaching of Jesus: to live for the good of others and never to answer evil with violence. Non-resistance is its outward rule, not a separate doctrine. Violence of any kind, whoever uses it and for whatever end, breaks the law of love, which is why he could make no exception for the soldier, the judge or the insurgent.

What does Tolstoy mean by violence?

Violence, for him, is force used on people against their will, and it is the ground every government stands on. The word covers far more than war: conscription, taxes collected under threat, courts, prisons and executions are all violence, however orderly the procedure. That breadth carries the argument, because it leaves no function of the state that someone who refuses violence could perform with a clear conscience.

How can Tolstoy reject the state and reject revolution too?

He rejected both for the same reason: both rest on violence. A government that coerces and a rising that kills to replace it break the same law, so overthrowing power by force would only found a new power on force. His remedy was refusal, people ceasing one by one to obey what their conscience condemns, and a Russian critic answered it in 1895 by calling the programme passive anarchy.

What is the superstition of progress?

It is the belief that the march of history justifies what conscience condemns. Tolstoy met it in Paris in 1857, watching a man guillotined: no theory of progress, he wrote later, could make that act right, and the judge of what is good was neither public opinion nor progress but his own heart. The phrase names his lasting rule of trusting a plain moral perception over any system that explains it away.

Is Tolstoy for or against reason?

For it, once the word is used as he used it. The reason that asked what would come of his life and found only death brought him to despair, because it measured the life of a single person. In On Life reason means something else: the consciousness that seeks the good of all beings and shows itself as love. That reason he called a person's true life.

Themes of the Mind

Concepts that recur together across the corpus held here, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of this philosopher's writing each one occupies.

A Meaning Death Cannot Take Away

Can a life mean anything if death undoes everything it holds? The question nearly ended his own life at fifty, and the answers he found reshaped everything he wrote after it.

Reason, asked what would come of any of it, answered nothing, and Schopenhauer, once read with delight, only agreed. The way out came from the peasants around him, who lived and died without that terror, and from a new account of faith: not assent to what one has been told but the knowledge of what life means, by which a person goes on living. On Life later gave the answer a philosopher's form. A person's real life is not the animal existence between birth and death but the life of reason, which seeks the good of all and shows itself as love, and over that life death has no hold.

  • meaning of life
  • death
  • mortality
  • faith
  • reason
  • life
  • true life
  • eternal life
  • existential despair
  • fear
  • consciousness
  • personal identity
  • happiness

Non-Resistance and the Law of Love

What is left of love if it may never answer evil with force? Everything in his reading of Jesus depends on taking that command exactly as it was spoken.

Do not resist evil: he read the verse as the key to the Sermon on the Mount, and drew from it five commandments against anger, divorce, oaths, violence and enmity between nations. Non-resistance is the outward rule of a single law, the law of love, which violence of any kind breaks, whoever uses it and for whatever end, so the Sermon rules out the insurgent's force as surely as the executioner's. Behind the reading stood an older conviction. In Paris in 1857 he watched a man guillotined, and concluded that the judge of what is good is neither public opinion nor progress but the heart.

  • nonresistance
  • nonviolence
  • love
  • violence
  • forgiveness
  • compassion
  • christian ethics
  • good and evil
  • evil
  • anger
  • moral law
  • oaths
  • enmity

Every State Is Organised Violence

If every government rests on soldiers, courts and prisons, may anyone who refuses violence take part in one? His answer made him an enemy of the state who refused the revolutionary's methods too.

Conscription, taxes, courts, prisons and the gallows: every state, he argued, rests in the end on force used on people against their will, and patriotism is the feeling governments cultivate in order to live. Whoever takes the teaching of Jesus as a way of life can serve in none of it. The remedy is not to seize power, which would be violence again, but to stop obeying what conscience condemns, and a Russian physician answered the programme in 1895 by calling it passive anarchy. He held himself to the argument: executions carried out in the name of order, he wrote in 1908, were carried out in his name.

  • state violence
  • political authority
  • political power
  • state power
  • coercion
  • obedience
  • conscription
  • militarism
  • war
  • patriotism
  • nationalism
  • capital punishment
  • government
  • civil disobedience
  • conscientious objection
  • anarchism

The Teaching Recovered From the Church

What did Jesus actually teach, once the church's explanations are set aside? A way of living rather than a God to worship, he concluded, and the answer cost him his place in the church.

He went back to the Greek text of the Gospels, set the miracle stories aside as legend, and kept whatever bore on how to live. What he found there was a teacher, not a God, and a rule of life that the church had buried under dogma and sacrament while blessing the oaths, courts, wars and executions the rule forbade. Religion, he told Berlin's secular moralists, is each person's relation to the infinite world or its source, and morality without it is only custom. In 1901 the Holy Synod declared that it no longer counted him a member; he replied that the decree was correct.

  • religious authority
  • biblical interpretation
  • scriptural interpretation
  • institutional religion
  • church
  • dogma
  • sacraments
  • religious hypocrisy
  • hypocrisy
  • miracles
  • resurrection
  • divinity
  • theology
  • religion
  • morality

Living on Other People's Labour

Can someone whose comfort rests on the work of others help anyone by giving? He concluded that the rich must stop taking, and he began the argument with his own drawing room.

The Moscow census of 1882 sent him into the city's worst lodging houses with a plan for charity, and the plan failed. The failure taught him that his own comfort and the hunger he had seen were one arrangement. Money, whatever the economists said, was a claim on other people's labour and the successor of slavery, so alms only returned a fraction of what had been taken. What remained was to live by one's own work, cut one's needs and use no one as a servant, and the book that argues it tells the failure against its author first.

  • labor
  • poverty
  • wealth
  • charity
  • property
  • money
  • exploitation
  • social inequality
  • division of labor
  • renunciation
  • taxation
  • social class
  • slavery
  • self-deception

The Novelist Who Put His Own Novels on Trial

What is art for, if the author of War and Peace could call his own fiction counterfeit? The test he set asks whether a work passes on a sincere feeling that unites people.

Beauty, he argued, was the wrong place to start. Art is the passing on of a feeling: someone who has felt something infects others with it through words, sounds, lines or movements, and a work is worth what the sincerity of the infection and the goodness of the feeling are worth. The best art carries the feelings that bind people together in brotherhood, and art made for the pleasure of the idle few is counterfeit. The test spared neither Beethoven's Ninth Symphony nor his own fiction, of which he kept only two short stories.

  • art
  • aesthetics
  • beauty
  • art criticism
  • aesthetic judgment
  • definition of art
  • music
  • poetry
  • emotion
  • art and society
  • imitation

By the numbers

works held
10
passages traced
6,196
concepts traced
2,832
thematic clusters
5

Concepts that travel together

The wheel takes the leading concepts of these writings and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “meaning of life” and “religion”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 23 pairings. 95 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
meaning of lifereligion26
meaning of lifereason21
reasonreligion21
laborreligion14
christian ethicsreligion12
labormoral responsibility12
christian ethicswar11
moral responsibilitystate violence10
moral responsibilityreligion9
labormeaning of life8
moral responsibilitywar8
christian ethicsstate violence6
religionwar6
religionstate violence5
christian ethicslabor4
laborwar4
christian ethicsreason3
state violencewar3
christian ethicsmoral responsibility2
laborreason2
moral responsibilityreason2
laborstate violence1
meaning of lifemoral responsibility1

The arc of a career

A cell's weight is that concept's share of the work's passages, so a column can be read downwards as well as a row across. Densest: religion in Religion and Morality, 50.7%.

Density 0% 50.7%

Concept density per work, chronological 10 works, in the order they were written. 8 concept columns, ranked by total weight. 79 further concepts fall outside the columns shown.
WorkYearreligionmeaning of lifestate violencechristian ethicsmoral responsibilitywarreasonlabor
A Confession4.1%46.4%0%0%0%0.5%11.9%5.7%
What I Believe14.6%3.3%0.4%13.6%2.3%2.3%4.8%4.8%
What Then Must We Do?3.1%0.6%0.7%0.4%6.7%0.1%0.8%29.6%
On Life4.3%8.5%0%1.6%2.9%0%27.7%0.3%
The Four Gospels Harmonized and Translated7.6%0.5%0.1%0.1%2.9%0.3%1.7%0.5%
Religion and Morality50.7%17.8%0%11%4.1%0%0%0%
The Kingdom of God Is Within You5.2%0.9%7.7%13.4%7.1%10.5%0.3%1.8%
What Is Art?8.9%0.2%0%0.4%0.2%0.6%0.2%4.3%
Patriotism and Government8.3%0%5%5%0%33.3%0%0%
I Cannot Be Silent4.8%0%40.5%4.8%23.8%2.4%0%0%

Works held

Titles in your language, the original beneath in brackets; “lit.” marks our own translation where no English edition exists. Side chips show which full texts are held.

CRISIS AND CONFESSION — THE GOSPELS READ PLAINLY

  1. 1884 A Confession (Исповедь)

    Tolstoy submitted it as an introduction to a larger, then-unpublished work, his critique of church theology and his own reading of the Gospels, and it stands at the door of everything he wrote after his conversion.

    RU

MONEY, LABOUR AND THE LIFE OF REASON

  1. 1885 What I Believe (В чём моя вера?)

    A statement of positive faith, written between 1882 and 1884: where A Confession ends at the threshold of belief, this book sets out what the belief is.

    RU
  2. 1886 What Then Must We Do? (Так что же нам делать?)

    Of all Tolstoy's post-conversion books, this is the one that starts in the street: it turns the religious conclusions of What I Believe onto money, work and the city he was living in.

    RU
  3. 1888 On Life (О жизни)

    After the social criticism of What Then Must We Do?, it gives Tolstoy's religious turn the form of a philosophical treatise, tried out first on Moscow's university philosophers.

    RU

AGAINST THE STATE — THE KINGDOM OF GOD IS WITHIN YOU

  1. 1892 The Four Gospels Harmonized and Translated (Соединение и перевод четырёх Евангелий)

    The workshop behind What I Believe and everything after it, and the long study that A Confession was written to introduce: a work of translation and commentary rather than argument.

    RU
  2. 1893 Religion and Morality (Религия и нравственность)

    In the same year he finished The Kingdom of God Is Within You, Tolstoy set down here, in compact form, what he meant by religion.

    RU
  3. 1893 The Kingdom of God Is Within You (Царство Божие внутри вас)

    The doctrine of non-resistance that What I Believe set out as a personal faith is here turned against the state itself.

    RU

ART, PATRIOTISM AND THE DOUKHOBORS

  1. 1897 What Is Art? (Что такое искусство?)

    Standing apart from the religious and political writing around it, this is Tolstoy's treatise on aesthetics.

    RU
  2. 1900 Patriotism and Government (Патриотизм и правительство)

    It follows "Christianity and Patriotism" (1894) and "Patriotism or Peace?" (1896), and goes further than either, from the feeling itself to the governments that live by it.

    RU

EXCOMMUNICATED — I CANNOT BE SILENT

  1. 1908 I Cannot Be Silent (Не могу молчать!)

    Two years before his death, Tolstoy turned from the treatise to the newspaper page: a signed article addressed to everyone who ordered, carried out or lived by the executions of 1908.

    RU
Begin a dialogue with Leo Tolstoy

— or wander to another mind

Set two minds against each other

Each of these is a question the two of them answer differently. Choose one and they argue it out, both drawing on the texts held here.