PhilosopherIndia

Sri Aurobindo

Revolutionary turned yogi of spirit evolving through matter

1 work · 388 passages grounded

Lifespan
1872–1950
Also known as
Aurobindo Ghose
Wikipedia

The mind

Krishna Dhun Ghose, a Bengali doctor who held British culture to be superior, meant his sons for the Indian Civil Service, the corps of officials through which Britain governed India. To fit them for it he took them to England in 1879, and his third son, Aurobindo, then seven, stayed fourteen years. He went to St Paul's School in London and King's College, Cambridge, where he read classics, and he passed the written examination for the service, ranked eleventh of 250. Then, by his own account, he deliberately failed the riding test that every candidate had to pass, and was disqualified.

He came home in 1893 to a post in the princely state of Baroda and a country he hardly knew. In thirteen years there he taught himself Bengali and Sanskrit, and with them the Upanishads, the Bhagavad Gita and the epics. The partition of Bengal in 1905 brought him to Calcutta, where he wrote for the paper Bande Mataram and demanded complete independence at a time when the Indian National Congress was asking for much less. In May 1908 the British arrested him in the Alipore bomb case, which followed a failed attempt to kill a British magistrate, and he spent a year in jail while the trial ran. He said afterwards that he had practised the yoga of the Gita in his cell, and that for two weeks he heard the voice of Swami Vivekananda, the monk who had carried Vedanta to the West. Chittaranjan Das, a Calcutta barrister, won his acquittal in May 1909.

Within a year he was gone from politics. Facing a fresh charge of sedition, he hid at Chandernagore and in April 1910 reached Pondicherry, a French enclave where the British warrant did not run. He stayed there for the remaining forty years of his life.

The thinking he did there starts from a refusal of two answers. The Life Divine, serialised from 1914 in the Arya, a monthly he founded, and revised as a book in 1939–40, calls them the materialist denial and the refusal of the ascetic. The first holds that only matter is real. The second, which he found in the Advaita of Shankara, the early medieval teacher of non-dualism, holds that only spirit is real and the world is maya, an illusion from which the wise escape. Aurobindo argued that both cut the knot instead of untying it. Spirit, on his account, has hidden itself in matter, and evolution is its slow return: matter produced life, life produced mind, and mind is not the last step. The next is what he called the supermind, a consciousness that knows the world from the side of the infinite. Human beings are a transitional stage. Yoga is that evolution made conscious and faster, and its aim is not release from rebirth, India's traditional goal, but the transformation of life on earth.

In November 1926 he withdrew into seclusion and handed the community that had gathered round him to Mirra Alfassa, a Frenchwoman his disciples called the Mother, who organised it as the Sri Aurobindo Ashram. India became independent on 15 August 1947, his seventy-fifth birthday; he had opposed the partition that came with it. He was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1943 and for the Peace Prize in 1950, and he died at Pondicherry that December.

Stephen Phillips, writing in the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, presents the system as an attempt to reconcile science and religion through evolution. Scholars have traced Western debts in it, to Hegel among others, though Aurobindo denied that Hegel had influenced him. The philosopher Ramakrishna Puligandla argues that his picture of Shankara is a misreading. His followers have not always welcomed scholarship from inside the ashram. When Peter Heehs, an American historian who worked in the ashram's archives, published The Lives of Sri Aurobindo in 2008, devotees' objections delayed its Indian edition, and in 2012 the Indian government at first declined to extend Heehs's residence visa.

Key concepts

What is the synthesis Sri Aurobindo finds in the Gita?

It is the joining of three ways to God that Indian tradition often kept apart: knowledge, works and love. Aurobindo reads the Gita as uniting them in one yoga instead of ranking them. Knowledge shows the one Self in all things, works are offered to God as a sacrifice, and devotion crowns both. Each way taken alone, he argues, leaves part of the person behind.

What does Sri Aurobindo mean by the divine birth?

It is a human being's growth into the nature of God. The Avatar is God coming down into a human life; the divine birth is the movement the other way, a person rising out of ego and restless desire into a consciousness one with the Divine. In Aurobindo's reading the Avatar comes chiefly to help that ascent, giving a pattern of divine manhood that others can grow into.

What is involution in Sri Aurobindo's thought?

Involution is spirit hiding itself in the world before it grows back out of it. Aurobindo reads the Gita's cosmos as a cycle that opens out from God and returns to God. The one Self first wraps itself in the forms of things, in life and in mind; then an evolution reveals, step by step, all that was hidden in them. What grows out of matter was in it from the start.

What is Mayavada, and why does Sri Aurobindo reject it?

Mayavada is the teaching that the world is maya, an illusion, and that only the unchanging Spirit is real. The Gita does speak of the maya of Nature's three modes, the qualities that drive all natural action, but Aurobindo denies that it teaches illusionism. On his reading it treats the world and action in it as real, and calling them mere appearance, he warns, strikes at the very roots of all works.

What is lokasangraha, the holding together of the peoples?

It is the work a freed person still does so that the world keeps its order and moves forward. The Gita names Janaka, a king who reached perfection through desireless work, as its example, and adds that the people follow whatever standard the best of them set. Aurobindo insists that this is not social service or altruism, but action that flows from oneness with God and with all beings.

Themes of the Mind

Concepts that recur together across the corpus held here, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of this philosopher's writing each one occupies.

One Yoga for the Whole Being

Must a seeker choose between thinking, working and loving as the road to God? Aurobindo finds in the Gita a refusal to choose, and builds his whole reading on it.

Indian tradition names three great ways to the Eternal: knowledge, works and love. Commentators made the Gita champion one of them, and some ranked its yoga of works the lowest. Aurobindo reads it instead as a single yoga that turns every power of a person Godward. Only children, the Gita says, speak of Sankhya and Yoga apart. Knowledge changes how work is done, work is offered as a sacrifice, and devotion, the climax, rests on both; union with a silent self alone would leave love nothing to stand on.

  • yoga
  • devotion
  • spiritual knowledge
  • surrender
  • philosophical synthesis
  • spiritual experience

Free, and Still at Work

Does a soul that has found perfect peace still owe the world anything? Liberation, as Aurobindo draws it from the Gita's fifth and sixth chapters, does not end action.

Nirvana in the Gita, he argues, is not the Buddhist's blissful negation of being but extinction in Brahman, and it can exist together with awareness of the world. The sages who reach it are, in the Gita's words, busy with the good of all creatures. Renunciation is inward: the true renouncer gives up desire, not work. Against the extreme Vedantists who called the world mere appearance, a view he says strikes at the root of all action, he keeps the freed person at work.

  • liberation
  • nirvana
  • spiritual liberation
  • spiritual freedom
  • freedom
  • Brahman
  • unity

The Divine Birth in Every Person

Is human nature as it stands the last word on what a person can be? Read through Aurobindo, the Gita treats it as a stage, with a greater being hidden inside it.

In each person, he writes, there is a hidden Self of which the present nature is only the outer appearance. Spirit first involves itself in the world and then evolves out of it: matter first, then sensation, mind, reason, and last spiritual consciousness. The Avatar comes down to show what that ascent looks like. Its goal is no superman of power, for the true superman is the one in whom the Godhead shows most. Nor is the individual to be sacrificed to society: he is asked to exceed himself into God.

  • spiritual evolution
  • spiritual transformation
  • divine nature
  • divinity
  • evolution
  • self-realization
  • human development

Looking Existence in the Face

What does a spiritual life owe a world that lives by devouring itself? Pretending the world is gentle, on Aurobindo's account, is the first thing such a life has to give up.

Strife and destruction, he holds, run through all existence. The Upanishads called hunger that is death the master of this world, and the Gita shows its God as Time the Destroyer as well as the friend of all creatures. He asks instead for a strong and impartial gaze, because to look existence in the face is to look God in the face. What meets the world's violence is not pity, which in Arjuna he calls a shrinking of the nerves, but compassion with calm strength in it.

  • violence
  • war
  • suffering
  • compassion
  • moral conflict
  • cosmology

A Truth No Scripture Owns

Can an ancient book still teach once its science and its social order have dated? Aurobindo's answer sorts what in a scripture belongs to its century from what belongs to every age.

Every scripture, he argues, holds two elements: one temporary, bound to the ideas of its time and country, and one eternal. The commentators who made the Gita a weapon for their own school missed that its mind is synthetic, a gate opening on the whole world of spiritual truth. So he declines to fix what it meant to its first hearers and asks what it can still give a living reader. Truth is one, he writes, and no single book, teacher or Avatar has spoken all of it.

  • interpretation
  • scriptural interpretation
  • religious pluralism
  • religion
  • vedanta

By the numbers

works held
1
passages traced
388
concepts traced
442
thematic clusters
6

Concepts that travel together

The wheel takes the leading concepts of these writings and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “action” and “liberation”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 22 pairings. 85 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
actionliberation22
gunasliberation12
liberationsacrifice12
karma yogaliberation11
desireliberation8
gunasnature8
actiongunas7
actionkarma yoga7
actionsacrifice6
liberationnature6
naturesacrifice6
actiondesire5
actionnature5
karma yogasacrifice5
desiregunas4
desirenature3
desiresacrifice3
gunaskarma yoga3
avatarhoodliberation2
desirekarma yoga2
karma yoganature2
gunassacrifice1

The arc of a career

A cell's weight is that concept's share of the work's passages, so a column can be read downwards as well as a row across. Densest: liberation in Essays on the Gita, 18.3%.

Density 0% 18.3%

Concept density per work, chronological A single work. 8 concept columns, ranked by total weight. 83 further concepts fall outside the columns shown.
WorkYearliberationactionnaturekarma yogagunasdesireavatarhoodsacrifice
Essays on the Gita18.3%16.8%10.1%9.5%9%8.2%8%8%

Works held

Titles in your language, the original beneath in brackets; “lit.” marks our own translation where no English edition exists. Side chips show which full texts are held.

PONDICHERRY — THE ARYA YEARS

  1. 1922 Essays on the Gita

    The first of Aurobindo's two series of essays on the Bhagavad Gita, covering its first six chapters, and the only part of the commentary that reached book form before 1928.

    EN
Begin a dialogue with Sri Aurobindo

— or wander to another mind

Set two minds against each other

Each of these is a question the two of them answer differently. Choose one and they argue it out, both drawing on the texts held here.