Back to the Greek, Past the Church
How can anyone learn what Jesus actually taught, when a church stands between the reader and the text? Tolstoy's answer was to translate the Greek again himself, verse by verse.
At the start of the 1880s Tolstoy decided that the only way to learn what Jesus had taught was to set aside what the church said about it and go back to the Greek. Earlier harmonies, Frederic Farrar's and Eduard Reuss's among them, ordered the four accounts by history; Tolstoy ordered them by meaning, drew John in with the other three, and argued with the church interpreters as he went. In 1902 he admitted forcing obscure passages to fit his reading, with artificial and probably wrong explanations of the Greek.
- translation
- textual criticism
- scriptural interpretation
- biblical interpretation
- interpretation
- scripture
- religious authority
- understanding
- truth
Enter a dialogue
- John's Gospel opens with 'the Word', but you translate the Greek logos as understanding. What does the opening sentence say when read that way?
- You later admitted forcing obscure passages to fit your reading — why should anyone trust the rest of the translation?
- The church says the devil tempted Jesus in the wilderness. Since God made the devil, you call that version self-contradictory. What do you make of the temptation?
- Where should someone begin who wants to read the Gospels without a church telling them what they mean?
- What changes when the Gospels are ordered by meaning rather than by the order in which events happened?