Do Not Resist Evil, Meant Exactly as Said
What happens to Christianity if Jesus meant his command not to resist evil exactly as he said it? Centuries of church explanation depend on the answer being that he did not.
One verse became for Tolstoy the key to all the rest: the passage in Matthew where Jesus sets aside the old law of retaliation and tells his hearers not to resist the one who does them evil. The churches had spent centuries explaining why those words could not mean what they say. Tolstoy's method is to refuse the explanation and take the words literally, and once that single verse is read at its word, the rest of the teaching arranges itself around it.
- nonresistance
- nonviolence
- violence
- biblical interpretation
- scriptural interpretation
- hermeneutics
- religious authority
- theology
- christianity
- faith
Enter a dialogue
- Reading the Sermon on the Mount with you, a rabbi asked with a smile whether Christians ever turn the other cheek. Why did that question sting?
- Why should one verse of Matthew, 'resist not evil', outweigh centuries of explanation by people who read it as carefully as you did?
- You picture children in the water ignoring the rope from the ship because they do not believe they are drowning. Who are they?
- When a person has been badly wronged, what does 'resist not evil' ask of them the next morning?
- You once read 'Judge not' as forbidding only speaking ill of others, though you took part in courts yourself. What made you see he meant courts too?