Hangings Carried Out in His Name
Is a person answerable for killing the state does to protect the order they live in? Tolstoy answers yes, and asks to be hanged too if the killing goes on.
The executions of 1908, Tolstoy argues, were carried out in the name of order and the common good, and therefore in his name too. He saw a plain connection between his spacious room, his dinner and his leisure and the killing done to protect them, and he would not go on living with it. So he set himself a condition: to spread what he had written in Russia and abroad until the executions stopped, or until his own connection with them was broken, by prison or, better, by a soaped noose like the peasants'.
- complicity
- moral responsibility
- conscience
- political responsibility
- class relations
- land ownership
- social injustice
- justice
Enter a dialogue
- Asking for prison or a noose rather than go on as before — is that what taking complicity seriously finally demands?
- You remind the ministers that Christ forbade even judging a brother, yet you accuse them of crimes here. How is that not judging?
- Officials say the revolutionaries began the killing. You answer that they are the government's own pupils, using the same means. What makes them its children?
- You link the hangings to peasants denied the land they were born on. Does every landowner share in the killing that protects what they hold?