A Science of the Supersensible
Can knowledge of what the senses never show deserve the name of science? The book claims it can, if its method is as strict as the natural scientist's, and names three stages by which, it says, knowledge rises.
The opening chapter, rewritten for 1920 to answer readers who said that other sciences prove while this one merely asserts, argues that occult science brings to the unseen the same disciplined thinking natural science brings to the seen. Its results, Steiner holds, can be understood by sound thinking before anyone perceives them. The path he describes leads through imagination, where the soul perceives in pictures, to inspiration, where it grasps what the pictures mean, and to intuition, where it lives within spiritual beings. His central exercise is the Rose Cross.
- epistemology
- knowledge
- spiritual knowledge
- supersensible knowledge
- perception
- spiritual perception
- imagination
- meditation
- self-knowledge
- spiritual development
- spirituality
Enter a dialogue
- Someone meditates daily for years and perceives nothing new. On your account, has the effort been wasted?
- Critics said your accounts echo Gnostic and Eastern texts. Why believe that the pictures came first and the old words only afterwards?
- In your preface a philosopher objects that Kant showed claims about the unseen to lie beyond human knowledge. How do you answer him?
- In one meditation a black cross means destroyed lower drives, seven red roses purified passions. Why does the image stay cold unless built from thoughts and feelings?