Three Spheres, Three Watchwords
Why did liberty, equality and fraternity never fit together in one state? The book's answer is that each belongs to a different sphere of society, and that each sphere must be given its own government.
The unified state, the book argues, failed because it ran three different kinds of life as one. Cultural life, from schools and universities to the arts, needs freedom, since abilities grow only where individuals judge for themselves. The life of rights, which concerns what every adult shares, needs equality and belongs to a democratic state. Economic life, the production and exchange of goods, needs fraternity and should be run by associations of producers, traders and consumers. Steiner likens the three to the systems of the human organism, each working by its own principles while serving the whole.
- threefold social order
- social organism
- social organization
- state
- rights
- social theory
- social philosophy
- individual freedom
- spiritual life
- education
- science
- spirituality
Enter a dialogue
- The human body has no single ruler, only nerves, circulation and digestion, each working by its own laws. Why should a society be built like that?
- Critics said liberty and equality have always contradicted each other. How does sorting them into separate spheres make the contradiction disappear?
- Someone feels the state reaching into every corner of their life, from school to wages. Where would your division draw the lines?
- A society split into three self-governing spheres sounds like three governments quarrelling. What holds them together when interests collide?
- A teacher, you say, should teach only so many hours as leave time to help run the school. Why not leave running it to trained administrators?