Observe Before Believing
Can claims about the soul be tested the way claims about the stars are? Everything the book asks of its student depends on whether they can.
Vivekananda treats religion as a science with its own instrument: the concentrated mind does for the inner world what the telescope does for the sky. Against scientists who dismiss reports of the extraordinary without investigating them, and believers who credit them to angels or gods, he argues that such knowledge comes from a superconscious state within the mind itself. People who stumbled into it untrained, he warns, came back with truths mixed with superstition. Real inspiration never contradicts reason, he insists, but fulfils it.
- religion
- perception
- knowledge
- epistemology
- reason
- consciousness
- samadhi
Enter a dialogue
- An astronomer needs a telescope and a chemist a laboratory, and so does religion, you argue. What instrument studies the soul?
- Scientists who dismiss miracle reports without looking into them seem admirably sober. Why do you find that as unscientific as blind belief?
- Deep sleep and samadhi, the state beyond thought, both leave thinking behind. Why does only one send a fool back as a sage?
- Mind-healers, spiritualists and faith-healers all handle one force they do not understand, in your view. What have they stumbled on?
- Prophets who stumbled into states beyond reason, in your account, brought back truth mixed with superstition. How can anyone tell inspiration from hallucination?