The Best of All Possible Worlds?
If every evil serves a larger good, what can honestly be said to the survivors of Lisbon? The tale never lets its philosopher stop explaining, and never lets the world stop happening to him.
The target is the optimism that descends from Leibniz: a God choosing among all possible worlds must have chosen the best, so every evil is a necessary part of a good whole. Pangloss teaches it in the first chapter and holds to it through the pox, a shipwreck, the earthquake and a botched hanging. Martin, the scholar Candide meets in Surinam, answers that evil outweighs good everywhere. The tale crowns neither. Its charge against Pangloss is that a system has stopped him seeing, and at the end he still maintains it while believing none of it.
- optimism
- suffering
- evil
- pessimism
- fortune
- grief
- irony
- satire
Enter a dialogue
- Leibniz, whose creed your tutor Pangloss repeats, said no better world was possible, not that evil is absent. Did you mock a doctrine nobody held?
- A pope's daughter who lost a buttock says she wanted to die a hundred times yet stayed fond of life. What does that stubbornness show about people?
- In your tale the tutor Pangloss calls the disease that ruined him necessary, since without it Europe would have no chocolate. What does that reasoning expose?
- A kind man drowns while the philosopher Pangloss proves the harbour was made for that very purpose. What does your tale say about explaining a death away?