WorkVoltaire

The Sermon of the Fifty

Framed as a Sunday sermon to a club of fifty believers in one God, it tries the Bible by the morality every people shares.

by Voltaire26 passages held

  • English, a translation held here, and your language
Original title
Sermon des cinquante
First published
(aged 68)
Original language
French

Report a rights issue

Overview

A pamphlet dated 1749, and in fact printed in 1762, holds that the Bible fails the test every religion must pass: its stories offend against the morality that all peoples share. Its title page reported that some attributed it to Du Marsais, a grammarian who had written for the Encyclopédie, and others to La Mettrie, the materialist doctor at the Prussian court, but that its real author was a great and learned prince, meaning Frederick II of Prussia. Both men were dead by then. The author was Voltaire, who had lived at Frederick's court in the early 1750s and who never acknowledged the piece. Its frame is a society of fifty educated and devout people who meet every Sunday in a large trading town to pray, hear one of their number preach, dine together and collect for the poor. The sermon's rule is that true religion is what all nations hold in common, the worship of one God and the practice of justice, and that whatever divides them is false. Two of its three parts take the Old Testament through its massacres, deceptions and improbabilities; the third turns to the Gospels, which it finds contradicting one another, and to the church built on them. The preacher asks the clergy to keep their property and preach what most of them privately believe. In October 1762 Voltaire wrote to Damilaville, a Paris tax official and one of his closest correspondents, that the sermon was edifying and that twenty copies were doing much good near his home, along with his abridgement of the testament of Jean Meslier, a village priest whose attack on religion was found after his death in 1729. He kept it out of every edition of his works printed under his supervision; the editors who published his works after his death counted it the first in which he attacked Christianity head-on. When he wrote it is still disputed, and the Oxford edition of his complete works places it among his writings of 1758 and 1759.

Key concepts

What test does the sermon use to judge a religion?

What all nations share is true, and what divides them is false. Every people worships a supreme being and teaches justice, so that much is the voice of God; the doctrines peculiar to one nation are where error lies. Religion must also agree with morality, so a religion whose doctrines offend against morality is false, however old or sacred its books.

What is the natural religion the fifty believe in?

The worship of one God, with nothing added that divides people. That God is the common father of all, so all are brothers who owe each other goodness and justice, and being just himself he rewards virtue and punishes crime. The sermon calls Christianity a perversion of this religion, and says it was the faith of Abraham and Noah, of the sages of antiquity and of the educated Chinese.

What two charges does the sermon bring against the Bible?

Perversity and falseness. The first part reads the Hebrew books for the conduct they present as holy, such as slaying twenty-three thousand men over the worship of a calf. The second weighs their likelihood: books credited to Moses that tell of things long after his time, and prodigies no evidence supports. The third part turns both tests on the Gospels.

Why does the sermon say the idol has lost only a finger or two?

Because the attack on superstition was begun and left unfinished. Earlier generations, the preacher says, already took from the people transubstantiation (the belief that the communion bread becomes Christ's body), confession to a priest, indulgences, exorcisms and false miracles, and the people grew used to living without them. The doctrines that remain are the rest of the idol, and the fifty mean to finish breaking it.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Scripture Tried by Common Morality

Can a book be God's word if it holds up as holy what every people calls a crime? Whatever all nations share is true, the preacher rules, and whatever divides them is false, so a scripture that offends common morality fails before its history is even weighed.

Two charges are brought, in order: perversity, then falseness. First the Hebrew books are read for the conduct they consecrate rather than merely report, massacres, deceptions and thefts done by God's order and in his name. Only then comes probability, the prodigies and the dates that contradict each other. The Gospels get the same treatment, their accounts of Jesus disagreeing on nearly every fact. Meanwhile Jews and Christians, reading the same prophets, fight each other with the same weapons.

  • biblical criticism
  • scriptural interpretation
  • biblical interpretation
  • historical criticism
  • evidence
  • prophecy
  • miracles
  • scripture
  • early christianity
  • morality
  • justice

A Reform Left Half Done

If many of the clergy no longer believe what they preach, why go on preaching it? The fifty answer that the people can bear the truth, and that the work their fathers began against superstition must now be finished.

Transubstantiation, confession to a priest, indulgences and false miracles were already taken from the people, the sermon says, and the people grew used to going without them; the idol has lost only a finger or two. What should remain is the worship of one God, common father of all, who rewards virtue and punishes crime. The preacher wants no one's property confiscated, only honesty from priests who privately laugh at their own doctrines. Righteousness, he promises, will grow as superstition shrinks.

  • superstition
  • religion
  • theology
  • religious authority
  • church and state
  • sectarianism
  • religious violence
  • fanaticism
  • hypocrisy
  • deception
  • reason

Within this work

passages held
26
distinct concepts
68
by passages held, corpus-wide
#756

What this book thinks together

The wheel takes this book’s leading concepts and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more of its passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “miracles” and “scriptural criticism”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 2 concepts, joined by 1 pairing. 18 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
miraclesscriptural criticism5

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. 1734 Philosophical Letters (Lettres philosophiques)

    Written out of the English stay that began in 1726 and published a quarter-century before Candide; it cost Voltaire his place in Paris and set out the programme that his later campaigns pursued.

    EN
  2. 1759 Candide (Candide, ou l'Optimisme)

    The most widely read of Voltaire's philosophical tales, a short novel published in the year he bought Ferney; its quarrel with optimism began in his poem on the Lisbon earthquake three years earlier.

    EN
  3. 1762 The Sermon of the Fifty (Sermon des cinquante) you are here EN
  4. 1763 Treatise on Tolerance (Traité sur la tolérance)

    Voltaire's contribution to his own campaign for Jean Calas, the best known of the wrongly condemned people he defended from Ferney; it appeared two years before the verdict was overturned.

    EN
  5. 1764 Philosophical Dictionary (Dictionnaire philosophique portatif)

    An alphabet that kept growing: begun as a single pocket volume, it was enlarged through the 1760s and swollen after Voltaire's death into the combined dictionary his editors assembled.

    EN
  6. 1772 We Must Take Sides (Il faut prendre un parti, ou le principe d'action)

    Written at seventy-seven, it turns Voltaire's arguments away from the Church he had attacked in The Sermon of the Fifty and against the atheists of d'Holbach's circle.

    EN
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works