WriterFrance

Christine de Pizan

The widow who answered the books written about women

7 works · 2,076 passages grounded

Lifespan
1364–1430
Also known as
Christine de Pisan
Wikipedia

The mind

In 1488 Antoine Vérard, a Paris publisher, printed a French manual of war and presented it as the work of Vegetius, a Roman author. A woman, Christine de Pizan, had written it in 1410, and the edition did not mention her. She had by then been dead for nearly sixty years, and had spent much of her working life on the argument that this printing illustrates: what the books of her time said against women was the opinion of the men who wrote them. Those men, she held, had observed a custom and reported it as nature.

She could make that argument because she had read the books. Her father, Tommaso da Pizzano, was physician and astrologer to King Charles V of France, and he brought the family from Venice to Paris when she was a small child. He taught her himself. At fifteen she married Étienne du Castel, a royal secretary, and ten years later he died, leaving her at twenty-five with three children and her mother to keep. To recover the money he was owed she fought cases in four Paris courts at once. She did not remarry. She read instead, without a teacher, and began to write for pay: lyric poems first, offered to the princes of the court in manuscripts made under her own direction. In The Book of the Mutability of Fortune, a long poem of 1403, she wrote that Fortune had turned her into a man.

Her reading brought her to the Romance of the Rose, a long French poem of the previous century, completed by Jean de Meun, in which the characters teach lovers to deceive women and describe women as faithless by nature. She attacked it in verse in The God of Love's Letter of 1399. Two years later, when a secretary of the king wrote in the poem's praise, she answered him by letter, refused a demand that she retract, and in February 1402 sent the whole correspondence to the queen. A writer, she maintained, answers for the words he gives his characters, since readers are changed by what they read.

The Book of the City of Ladies, finished by 1405, states the larger claim. Women seem to know less than men because they are kept at home and left untaught, and a daughter sent to school like a son would learn as well. The book makes the case through the stories of women who ruled, fought, invented and studied. Its sequel, The Treasure of the City of Ladies, advises living women of every rank on how to manage alone, as she had.

The court she depended on was breaking apart. The reigning king, Charles VI, had suffered attacks of madness since 1392 and his relatives fought over the government, so she wrote for them too: a life of Charles V as the model of a studious king, and the manual of war, which holds that only a sovereign seeking justice may lawfully fight. In 1418, when the Burgundian faction took Paris, she left. Her last poem, dated 31 July 1429, says she had spent eleven years enclosed in an abbey, usually taken to be Poissy, where her daughter was a nun. The poem celebrates Joan of Arc, who had relieved Orléans that May. Christine died around 1430.

Her books were copied, translated and printed for another century, and then went largely unread. Simone de Beauvoir, in 1949, called her the first woman to take up her pen in defence of her sex, and a modern English translation of the City of Ladies followed in 1982. Whether she should be called a feminist is disputed. The same writer who argued that women can learn as well as men also defended rank, and taught obedience within it.

Key concepts

What does Christine de Pizan mean by custom passed off as nature?

She means that what the books call women's nature is the result of how girls are brought up. Women appear to know less because they are kept at home and left untaught, and writers who saw the result took it for an inborn limit. Her test is a school: send daughters there like sons, Reason says in The Book of the City of Ladies, and they will learn every science as well.

Why does Christine call the case against women one-sided?

Because only one party ever wrote. In The God of Love's Letter the authors who blame women are compared to litigants pleading in a court where the other side is absent, so their agreement with each other counts for little, and some had private grudges besides. Had women written the books, the poem says, they would read otherwise. A verdict needs both sides heard.

What weight does Christine give experience against written authority?

Decisive weight, where the experience is first-hand. The Book of the City of Ladies opens with her nearly persuaded by the authors that women are worthless, until Reason tells her to trust what she knows of herself and of other women over what she has read. In her letters on the Romance of the Rose the same move becomes a rule of evidence: a woman can testify to what women are, while a man writing about them is guessing.

What makes an author responsible for his characters' words?

The effect on readers, in her view. A poet may put a speech in the mouth of a jealous husband or a seducer, but he chose to write it, and the reader carries the lesson away whoever spoke it. In her letters on the Romance of the Rose she compares this to reminding a sick man of sour apples: the warning only fixes them in his mind. A book is judged by what it teaches.

Why does prudence count for more than birth in Christine's thought?

Because birth protects no one once a husband, an income or a patron is gone, and prudence can. She means practical judgement: knowing the law and the accounts, reading the temper of the people nearby, and guarding a reputation as carefully as money. The Treasure of the City of Ladies teaches it to princesses and to labourers' wives alike, on the assumption that any woman may one day have to manage alone.

What does chivalry mean in her books on kings and war?

Service of the common good through planning and judgement, more than feats of arms. In her life of Charles V she calls a king chivalrous who seldom rode to battle, because he chose able captains, kept his armies supplied and won back lost territory. Her manual of war adds law: a knight fights only in a sovereign's just quarrel. Chivalry becomes something that can be studied.

Themes of the Mind

Concepts that recur together across the corpus held here, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of this philosopher's writing each one occupies.

What women are, and who said so

Do the books describe women, or the men who wrote them? If the second, a whole library of learned opinion is evidence about its authors, and a girl's ignorance proves only that nobody taught her.

The authors who call women weak and fickle pleaded with no opposing party, and several had private reasons for their grievance. Against them Christine sets what a woman knows of herself, and a test nobody had run: send daughters to school like sons and they will learn as well. Women know less because they are kept at home. Her opponents were Ovid, Jean de Meun and Matheolus. It follows, for her, that the agreement of the learned can be mistaken about half of humankind.

  • women
  • gender
  • education
  • chastity

What a writer answers for

Is a book excused by its art, or by the fiction that a character and not the author is speaking? Christine judged writing by what it does to the people who read it, and held her own books to the same measure.

A reader remembers the lesson whoever speaks it, so the poet who writes out a seducer's method has taught seduction. That was her case against the Romance of the Rose, argued against royal secretaries who told her to retract. The same standard governs her own work: praise must be true or it is flattery, borrowed material must fit, and a text is weighed, as she says with Seneca, by its words and not by the standing of whoever wrote them. Her dream of Dame Opinion adds a caution: what scholars hold is seldom certainty.

  • rhetoric
  • deception
  • love
  • sexual ethics
  • knowledge
  • wisdom

Prudence, for whoever must manage alone

What protects a person when husband, income and favour can vanish within a year? Her answer is a trained judgement about money, law and reputation, and a mind to which study has given something that cannot be taken.

Widowed at twenty-five, she tells her life in her dream vision of 1405 as a complaint against Fortune, and has Philosophy reply that the losses bought her the study she ranks above everything Fortune took. The Treasure of the City of Ladies turns that into advice for women of every rank: read the accounts, know the law, guard your name, show enemies a friendly face. Prudence here includes concealment, and she says so. It also keeps within bounds: each woman is taught to live well inside her rank and her marriage, and both are left standing.

  • prudence
  • reputation
  • marriage
  • honor
  • humility
  • charity
  • religion
  • virtue

Power answerable to justice

What makes a ruler fit to rule, and a war lawful to fight? With the king subject to attacks of madness and the princes arming against each other, she answered that both are matters of learning and law before they are matters of courage.

Her model king, Charles V, rarely rode to battle. He studied, kept an ordered day, chose able captains and thought lordship more burden than glory, and she calls that chivalry. Her manual of war draws the same line: only a sovereign may fight, and only to obtain justice, never for revenge or conquest. Students, ploughmen and the holder of a safe-conduct are no fair prize. In her dream of France the kingdom is a mother ridden down by her own sons. Throughout she denies that birth and daring are enough.

  • justice
  • kingship
  • political authority
  • leadership
  • law
  • war
  • military strategy
  • siege warfare
  • courage
  • diplomacy
  • loyalty
  • virtue ethics

By the numbers

works held
7
passages traced
2,076
concepts traced
1,560
thematic clusters
5

Concepts that travel together

The wheel takes the leading concepts of these writings and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “prudence” and “virtue”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 25 pairings. 87 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
prudencevirtue15
gendervirtue12
justicevirtue12
deceptionjustice11
justiceprudence10
genderjustice8
justicevirtue ethics8
deceptionprudence7
deceptionsexual ethics7
genderrhetoric7
justicerhetoric7
genderprudence6
gendervirtue ethics6
justicesexual ethics5
rhetoricsexual ethics5
deceptiongender4
deceptionvirtue ethics3
gendersexual ethics3
rhetoricvirtue3
sexual ethicsvirtue3
deceptionvirtue2
rhetoricvirtue ethics2
deceptionrhetoric1
prudencevirtue ethics1
sexual ethicsvirtue ethics1

The arc of a career

A cell's weight is that concept's share of the work's passages, so a column can be read downwards as well as a row across. Densest: gender in The God of Love's Letter, 45.2%.

Density 0% 45.2%

Concept density per work, chronological 7 works, in the order they were written. 8 concept columns, ranked by total weight. 90 further concepts fall outside the columns shown.
WorkYeargenderjusticedeceptionvirtuevirtue ethicsrhetoricprudencesexual ethics
The God of Love's Letter45.2%19.4%29%0%25.8%9.7%0%9.7%
Debate of the Romance of the Rose12.9%7.5%9.5%7.5%3.4%22.4%0%22.4%
Le Livre des fais et bonnes meurs du sage roy Charles V0.9%7.7%2.9%10.6%3.1%2%6.9%0.2%
The Book of the City of Ladies13%8.9%3.7%12.2%0.2%1.2%4.1%0.4%
The Treasure of the City of Ladies3.2%5.5%0.9%16.5%4.3%0.9%17.9%0.9%
The Vision of Christine de Pizan1.4%5.9%1.4%7.3%0%0.5%2.3%1.4%
The Book of Deeds of Arms and of Chivalry0.3%12.9%11.6%0.8%1.3%0%5.4%0%

Works held

Titles in your language, the original beneath in brackets; “lit.” marks our own translation where no English edition exists. Side chips show which full texts are held.

POEMS & THE QUARREL OVER THE ROSE

  1. 1399 The God of Love's Letter (Épître au dieu d'Amours)

    Her first long poem and her first defence of women, written in 1399. Its complaint returns in her letters on the Romance of the Rose and again in The Book of the City of Ladies.

    FR
  2. 1402 Debate of the Romance of the Rose (Les Epistres du débat sus le Roman de la Rose)

    Letters, gathered into a dossier by Christine herself in 1402 with her opponents' side included. They stand between the poem of 1399 that first attacked Jean de Meun and The Book of the City of Ladies of 1405.

    FR

PROSE — THE CITY OF LADIES & THE WISE KING

  1. 1404 lit. The Book of the Deeds and Good Conduct of the Wise King Charles V Le Livre des fais et bonnes meurs du sage roy Charles V

    A duke ordered this biography of the king in 1404. Her prose books of advice to princes came after it.

    FR
  2. 1405 The Book of the City of Ladies (Le Livre de la cité des dames)

    The book she is most read for today, finished by 1405. It gathers the arguments of her earlier poem and letters against Jean de Meun into a single allegory, and its three ladies return in the sequel.

    EN
  3. 1405 The Treasure of the City of Ladies (Le trésor de la cité des dames de degré en degré et de tous estatz)

    The sequel to The Book of the City of Ladies, finished the same year, 1405: the first book defends women by example, and this one tells them what to do. It was the more often printed of the two in the century after her death.

    FR
  4. 1405 The Vision of Christine de Pizan (L'avision de Christine)

    One of three books dated 1405, with The Book of the City of Ladies and its sequel, and the last of her allegories. It is the one in which she tells her own story.

    FR

LATE — WAR & ITS LAW

  1. 1410 The Book of Deeds of Arms and of Chivalry (Le Livre des fais d'armes et de chevalerie)

    A manual in four parts, compiled around 1410 from Roman and recent authorities on war and its law. It belongs with her late books of political advice for the French court, and it stands furthest from the subjects she is now read for.

    FR
Begin a dialogue with Christine de Pizan

— or wander to another mind

Set two minds against each other

Each of these is a question the two of them answer differently. Choose one and they argue it out, both drawing on the texts held here.