War as a craft that can be taught
Can a captain learn from a book what his fathers learned by surviving? The first half bets that victory belongs to method and foresight more than to numbers or daring.
Vegetius, Frontinus and Valerius Maximus are put into French for captains who had no Latin, and brought up to date with gunners and siege engines. The lesson running through the borrowed chapters is that armies are lost to hunger, bad ground and haste before they are lost to the enemy. A captain should take counsel, feed and pay his men, spare prisoners so that the enemy is not driven to despair, and use ruses freely. Courage is assumed; what the book adds is the planning that keeps it from being wasted.
- military strategy
- siege warfare
- leadership
- military leadership
- military logistics
- prudence
- military training
- military engineering
- fortification
- morale
- courage
- terrain
- weapons
- military tactics
- military history
- deception
- defense
Enter a dialogue
- Cato, you report, thought his written rules of war served Rome better than any battle he won. What can a book do for soldiers that courage cannot?
- Prisoners treated too harshly teach the enemy to fight to the death. Is mercy in your manual a duty, or simply the shrewder tactic?
- Hunger and thieving quartermasters beat armies in your manual before any enemy does. What does that say about where large undertakings really fail?
- A retreating captain, you advise, should tell his own men it is a ruse against the enemy. When may a leader deceive those who trust him?