A Human History of Morality and Art
Not whether morality, religion and art are true, but how they came to be, and the answer finds low, ordinary origins where tradition saw the eternal. Applied like a chemist's method, the question dissolves the aura around everything the age most revered.
In place of his first book's grand metaphysics, Nietzsche adopts Paul Ree's cool, naturalistic account of morality's descent and turns it on the higher things at large. Short aphorisms trace religion, morals and art back to vanity, self-deception and the small mechanics of social life, asking after origin rather than truth. The aim is deflation: what looked eternal turns out to have a merely human genealogy. Dedicated to Voltaire on the centenary of his death, the method plants a flag in the Enlightenment camp and sets loose the suspicion the later books would harden into a system.
- psychology
- human nature
- morality
- ethics
- self-deception
- vanity
- social psychology
- cultural evolution
- secularism
- resentment
Enter a dialogue
- Does showing that morality grew from vanity and self-deception really prove it false, or just explain how it arose?
- You propose a 'chemistry' that breaks love, devotion and pity into baser ingredients. Could anyone turn it on their own heart and still love?
- Why did dreams, in your account, lead early people to believe in a second world of spirits and to split a person into body and soul?
- A saint's power in history rests less on what he is than on how others misread his states of soul. What did that misreading give him?
- Artists want us to believe in sudden inspiration, yet Beethoven's notebooks show his finest melodies gathered slowly. Why would an artist hide the labour behind a work?