Wagner as the Artist of Decadence
The former disciple settles an old account: Wagner's music is not merely bad but a symptom, exhaustion staged as grandeur, theatre and narcotic that overwhelms the nerves. German rapture over him diagnoses what has gone wrong with the age.
Setting Bizet's Carmen against Wagner as a bright counter-example of lightness and health, Nietzsche turns his former idol into a test case for his whole late theme: the difference between what strengthens life and what merely flatters its decline. The charge is that Wagner's art overwhelms rather than composes, a decadence a healthy culture would have outgrown, and that a nation's enthusiasm for it is itself a symptom to be read. What lifts the 1888 polemic above gossip is that it aims his sharpest, funniest prose at an enthusiasm he had once felt more deeply than anyone.
- aesthetics
- decadence
- cultural criticism
- artistic integrity
- taste
- mass culture
- music
- theater
Enter a dialogue
- You say the musician has become an actor and his art a talent for lying. Why is theatrical power a sign of decay rather than of skill?
- Isn't music that overwhelms the nerves a sign of its power, rather than the decadence you accuse Wagner of?
- Young Wagnerians sit pale, rigid and breathless, and you call the theatre a mass uprising against good taste. What is dangerous about being swept away together?
- What do you hear in Bizet's Carmen that tells you it strengthens life where Wagner's music flatters decline?
- Wagner's Ring began as a hopeful story of a new world, you say, then was recast after the pessimist Schopenhauer so everything fails. Why call that his rescue?