Every View Caught in One Net
The teachers of the age argued over whether the self and the world are eternal and what survives death. The first discourse asks why all of them, however opposed, end up in the same net.
Sixty-two ways of speculating about the past and the future are listed: eternalists, those who call some beings eternal and others not, eel-wrigglers who will answer nothing, those who say the self perishes at death, and those who place release in present pleasure. The Buddha does not refute them one by one. He traces every view to the sensations and craving of those who hold it, like fish in a fine-meshed net, and says he is free because he knows how sensation rises and passes.
- rebirth
- afterlife
- consciousness
- perception
- causation
- craving
- knowledge
- wisdom
Enter a dialogue
- You catch sixty-two theories about the self and the world in one net, like fish in a pond. Why does not one of them slip through?
- Someone feels certain that the world goes on forever, or that death ends everything. What would you show them about where that certainty comes from?
- A chieftain argues that no dead friend has ever come back to tell him of another world. Why is that silence no proof there is none?
- You speak of "my self" like everyone else, yet deny the self the teachers quarrel over. How can someone use the word without being misled by it?
- Some teachers in your net hold that release is simply happiness enjoyed in this visible world. Why is even that view caught with the rest?