Blind Men and the Elephant
Rival ascetics at Sāvatthī quarrel over whether the world is eternal, each calling his own view the truth and the rest folly. Why do sincere people who see part of something fight over the whole?
The Buddha answers with a story. A king had the men born blind in his city brought before an elephant, each made to touch one part of it, and asked them what an elephant is. Those who felt the head said a pot, those who felt the tail a broom, and the argument ended with fists. The rival teachers, he says, are like them: they do not know what matters and what does not, what is true and what is not, cling each to his part, and quarrel because they have seen only one side of the matter.
- philosophical disagreement
- metaphysics
- ignorance
- wisdom
- attachment
- anger
Enter a dialogue
- Men born blind each touch one part of an elephant and come to blows over what an elephant is. What are the rival teachers missing, in your story?
- Two friends fall out over a question neither of them can settle, and each calls the other a fool. What would your elephant story say to them?
- If every school sees only one part of the elephant, what makes you sure your own teaching is not one more blind man's report?
- In your story a king stages the test and is delighted when the blind men start fighting. Why is the one who can see so pleased?