PhilosopherIndia

Nāgārjuna

The monk who argued that nothing stands on its own

2 works · 254 passages grounded

Lifespan
~150–~250
School
Madhyamaka
Wikipedia

The mind

If nothing has a nature of its own, his critics objected, then the Buddha's teaching has nothing to stand on: no suffering to end, no path out of it, no nirvana at the end of the path. Nāgārjuna wrote that objection into his own verses to answer it. The charge that he emptied the world into nothing was first made in ancient India, and his answer to it is the claim he is remembered for. Things are empty, he argued, because they exist only in dependence on their causes, their parts and the names that pick them out, and that dependence is what lets them arise, change and end. A world of things fixed by a nature of their own, svabhāva, could do none of that.

His first opponents were fellow Buddhists. The Abhidharma schools, the scholars who had turned the Buddha's teaching into a system, had broken experience down into its smallest elements and credited each one with a nature of its own; the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy names the Sarvāstivāda and the Sautrāntika among the schools he targeted. Behind him stood the Perfection of Wisdom sūtras, a body of Mahāyāna scripture that declared all things empty. Nāgārjuna gave that claim its arguments, taking up causation, motion, the self, time and nirvana one by one and showing that each, taken as self-standing, ends in contradiction. In the Vigrahavyāvartanī, seventy verses with his own prose commentary, he answered objections from fellow Buddhists and from the Nyāya, the Hindu school of logic.

Of the man himself little is certain. Historians place him between about 150 and 250 CE, a monk who lived mainly in southern India, and Joseph Walser, a historian of Buddhism, argues that he advised a king of the Sātavāhana dynasty. Two letters of advice to a king are ascribed to him, the Ratnāvalī and the Suhṛllekha, known in English as Letter to a Friend. Scholars disagree over which other works are his, partly because more than one author bore the name. The tradition tells more. A biography translated into Chinese by Kumārajīva around 405 makes him a Brahmin by birth and the greatest bodhisattva since the Buddha. Later Tibetan accounts tell that the nāgas, serpent beings who live beneath the waters, gave him the Perfection of Wisdom sūtras from their realm, that he lived six hundred years and that he gave his head to a prince.

His verses, the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā or The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way, founded Madhyamaka, the school of the middle way. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy records unanimous agreement that he is the most important Buddhist philosopher after the Buddha. Kumārajīva put the verses into Chinese in 409. In Tibet, where he is called the second Buddha, a reading of his thought known as Prāsaṅgika-Madhyamaka became the official philosophical position of Tibetan Buddhism.

Key concepts

What is dependent origination?

It is the Buddha's account of how suffering comes about, link by link, which Nāgārjuna sets at the heart of his own thought. A chain of twelve conditions runs from ignorance through craving and grasping to birth, old age and death. Each link exists only because the one before it does, so the chain can be broken: when ignorance is destroyed, the verses say, the rest no longer arise.

What is nirvana, if it is not a place or a thing?

Nirvana is the ending of suffering, and the verses describe it almost entirely by what it is not: not abandoned, not attained, not cut off, not eternal, not destroyed, not arisen. It is neither something that exists nor nothing. This is not evasion: anything with a nature of its own could be gained or lost, and nirvana is precisely the end of that whole economy of gaining and losing.

What is prapañca, the mind's elaboration?

Prapañca is the mind's habit of spinning out concepts, names and distinctions until they seem to be the world itself. The verses trace a chain: deeds and the defilements behind them come from mental constructions, and these come from elaboration, which clings to everyday talk as if it described fixed things. Emptiness is what stills it, and the verses open by praising the Buddha for teaching that stilling.

Who is a solitary buddha?

A solitary buddha, a pratyekabuddha, is someone who wakes up without a teacher, at a time when no Buddha has appeared and the disciples of earlier ones have died out. The verses use the figure to show that the truth does not depend on anyone handing it on: the knowledge arises on its own, out of detachment and earlier effort, independent of others.

Themes of the Mind

Concepts that recur together across the corpus held here, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of this philosopher's writing each one occupies.

Neither Being nor Nothing

Saying that a thing truly exists and saying that it does not are the two ways of getting it wrong. What he asks is how to speak of a world real enough to act in that stands on nothing of its own.

His opponents were fellow Buddhists who had reduced experience to its smallest elements, each fixed by a nature of its own, and his charge is that such natures would freeze the world: what is already what it is by itself could never arise, change or end. Against them he does not set nothingness, which he treats as the opposite error, but dependence. Causes, time, the person and the Buddha himself turn out to exist only in relation, and that is enough for them to work.

  • emptiness
  • dependent origination
  • dependent arising
  • dependence
  • svabhava
  • intrinsic existence
  • existence
  • causality
  • causation
  • arising
  • arising and ceasing
  • identity
  • difference
  • time
  • self
  • aggregates

Loosening the Grip

Clinging to views, to a self and to possessions keeps the round of rebirth turning. The question is what letting go looks like, for a thinker in his verses and for a king on his throne.

Suffering, for Nāgārjuna, is fed by grasping, and the subtlest grasping is intellectual: holding that things are, or that they are not, or even holding on to release as a prize. His verses deny that anyone is truly bound or truly freed, yet he never treats conduct as optional. In his letter to a king the same teaching turns into practice: give wealth away while it lasts, shun wine and other men's wives, see the body as hollow, and remember the hells that wait for those who forget.

  • nirvana
  • liberation
  • suffering
  • cessation
  • karma
  • action
  • rebirth
  • impermanence
  • perception
  • ethics
  • Buddhist ethics
  • merit
  • desire
  • craving
  • anger
  • mindfulness
  • meditation
  • wisdom
  • hell
  • peace of mind

By the numbers

works held
2
passages traced
254
concepts traced
205
thematic clusters
5

Concepts that travel together

The wheel takes the leading concepts of these writings and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “dependent origination” and “emptiness”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 23 pairings. 91 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
dependent originationemptiness21
emptinessnirvana10
karmarebirth10
dependent originationkarma9
dependent originationliberation9
emptinesskarma7
impermanencerebirth6
dependent originationimpermanence5
impermanencekarma5
dependent originationrebirth3
emptinessimpermanence3
emptinessliberation3
karmaliberation3
karmanirvana3
liberationnirvana3
dependent originationnirvana2
ethicskarma2
impermanenceliberation2
impermanencenirvana2
liberationrebirth2
nirvanarebirth2
ethicsimpermanence1
ethicsrebirth1

The arc of a career

A cell's weight is that concept's share of the work's passages, so a column can be read downwards as well as a row across. Densest: karma in Letter to a Friend, 47.4%.

Density 0% 47.4%

Concept density per work, chronological 2 works, in the order they were written. 8 concept columns, ranked by total weight. 52 further concepts fall outside the columns shown.
WorkYearkarmadependent originationrebirthnirvanaimpermanenceemptinessliberationethics
The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way12.8%28.5%5.5%8.5%8.1%28.9%6.8%0.4%
Letter to a Friend47.4%10.5%31.6%21.1%21.1%0%21.1%21.1%

Works held

Titles in your language, the original beneath in brackets; “lit.” marks our own translation where no English edition exists. Side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. Letter to a Friend (Suhṛllekha)

    The practical counterpart to the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā: where that work argues, this one advises, and its reader is a layman with a kingdom to run.

    EN
  2. The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way (Mūlamadhyamakakārikā)

    Nāgārjuna's main philosophical work, written as verse compressed for memorising and meant to be unpacked by a teacher — which is how this German version carries it, inside a commentary.

    DE
Begin a dialogue with Nāgārjuna

— or wander to another mind

Set two minds against each other

Each of these is a question the two of them answer differently. Choose one and they argue it out, both drawing on the texts held here.