PhilosopherIndia

Rāmānuja

The commentator for whom the world is God's body

2 works · 1,052 passages grounded

Lifespan
~1077–~1157
Also known as
Ramanujacharya
Wikipedia

The mind

Advaita, the non-dualism taught by Śaṅkara, holds that only one thing is finally real: Brahman, pure consciousness without qualities. The self is identical with it, and the world of many persons and things is an appearance produced by ignorance. That is how Advaita reads the Upanishads, the closing portion of the Vedas. Rāmānuja, a Brahmin teacher from the Tamil south of India, came some centuries after Śaṅkara and argued through all three of his large works that the reading was wrong. On his account Brahman is a personal God, Vishnu, with good qualities beyond number. The selves and the material world are real, and they belong to God as a body belongs to the self that lives in it. What frees a person is loving devotion to that God, answered by his grace.

Almost nothing about his life can be checked. The record is his own writing; the rest comes from biographies written by his followers in the generations after his death. They place his birth at Śrīperumbūdūr, near modern Chennai, in 1017 and his death at Śrīraṅgam in 1137, a life of 120 years. Historians place him later, at about 1077 to 1157. The tradition says that he studied at Kāñcīpuram under Yādavaprakāśa, a teacher of Vedānta, the philosophy built on the Upanishads. The pupil quarrelled with his teacher over the meaning of scripture, it says, and left him. It says that Yāmuna, who led the Śrīvaiṣṇava community of Vishnu worshippers at Śrīraṅgam, hoped for him as a successor but died just before Rāmānuja reached him, and that five of Yāmuna's disciples taught him instead. One of the five, the tradition says, swore him to silence before disclosing the community's secret formula; Rāmānuja then shouted it from the temple balcony to the worshippers below, accepting hell for himself if they were saved. It also tells of his giving up his household to become a renouncer, of his reorganising worship at the great temple of Śrīraṅgam, and of years spent in the Hoysala kingdom, in the region of Mysore, after he fled a Chola king devoted to Shiva.

Three works are securely his: the Vedārthasaṃgraha, a treatise whose title means "Summary of the Meaning of the Vedas" and probably his earliest work; the Śrībhāṣya, his main work, a commentary on the Brahma Sūtra, the aphorisms in which Vedānta sums up the Upanishads; and the Bhagavadgītā-bhāṣya, a verse-by-verse commentary on the Bhagavadgītā. The treatise and the Gītā commentary each carry an opening verse of homage to Yāmuna. The treatise answers three rival readings of the Upanishads and names none of their authors. One of them, that Brahman is both different and not different from the selves, is the one scholars usually identify as Yādavaprakāśa's. Yādavaprakāśa's writings on Vedānta are lost, and most of what is known of his views comes from Rāmānuja, who refuted them.

Against Advaita, Rāmānuja argued that the doctrine undoes itself. If every means of knowing is infected with error, then so is scripture, and so is the knowledge that all is error. Knowledge, he held, is always of something real and always of a thing with qualities. Perception and inference cannot reach God, which is why scripture counts for him as a source of knowledge in its own right. The Upanishads say to a student "that you are", and Advaita takes the sentence as a plain identity. Rāmānuja read it through the body: a word for a body reaches through to the self within it, so "you" names God as the inner self of the hearer. The school is called Viśiṣṭādvaita, usually translated as qualified non-dualism: Brahman is one, and the many are real as its body.

In the generations after his death his followers came to teach surrender to God, prapatti, as a path in its own right. Their disagreement over whether surrender needs any human effort was among the disputes that divided the community into a northern and a southern school. Scholars still dispute whether his three large works teach surrender as a separate path at all. Madhva, the thirteenth-century founder of the dualist school of Vedānta, rejected even the qualified identity of self and God that Rāmānuja had kept. In Śrīvaiṣṇava temples and homes, worship still follows the order ascribed to Rāmānuja.

Key concepts

What is Viśiṣṭādvaita, or qualified non-dualism?

It is the view that there is one ultimate reality, Brahman, and that this one is never bare. Brahman is God together with everything that qualifies him: the many selves and the material world, which are real and exist only as belonging to him. 'Non-dualism' says that nothing stands beside God as a second, independent thing. 'Qualified' says that the one is not empty, just as a person is one and still has a real body.

What is Vedānta, and what do its schools disagree about?

Vedānta is the tradition of philosophy built on the Upanishads, the closing portion of the Vedas. Its schools share those texts and disagree about what they teach: how God, the self and the world are related. Advaita answers that only Brahman is real and that the self is identical with it. Rāmānuja answers that selves and world are real and belong to God. Each school has to show that the same scriptures support its reading.

What counts as a source of knowledge for Rāmānuja?

Three things count: perception, reasoning from what is perceived, and scripture. Each has its own field. The senses show material things, and reasoning extends what they show. Neither reaches God, so what is known of him comes from the Vedas, which Rāmānuja takes to carry their own authority. Because the fields differ, scripture never contradicts what the senses rightly report, and a reading of scripture that denies the visible world must be a wrong reading.

Why does Rāmānuja say that Brahman has qualities?

Because nothing can be known, named or worshipped without them. No source of knowledge ever shows a thing with no features at all, he argues, so a Brahman without qualities could not even be taught. Where the Upanishads call Brahman 'without qualities', he reads them as denying faults such as change, ignorance and suffering. What remains is a God who knows all things, rules them and shows compassion, with good qualities beyond number.

How is the self related to God in Rāmānuja's thought?

The self belongs to God: it exists for his sake, as a body exists for the one who lives in it. Rāmānuja treats this as part of what a self is, not as a duty laid on it from outside. A self is a knower, has no beginning and is one of many, yet it never stands alone. The wish to be independent is a self mistaking its own nature, and serving God is that nature fulfilled.

What is release, or liberation, for Rāmānuja?

Release is the end of a self's bondage to its past deeds and to birth in one body after another. The self does not dissolve and does not become God. Freed from matter, it knows without hindrance, is like God in purity and joy, and lives in the unbroken experience of him. A self that only rests in itself reaches a lesser freedom. Release comes through loving devotion and is given by God's grace.

Themes of the Mind

Concepts that recur together across the corpus held here, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of this philosopher's writing each one occupies.

A World That Is Not a Dream

Is the world of many persons and things a mistake that true knowledge cancels? Rāmānuja answers that knowing is always the knowing of something real, and that a teaching which calls everything error has called itself one.

Advaita, the non-dualism taught by Śaṅkara, holds that only a consciousness without qualities is real and that ignorance makes it appear as a world. Rāmānuja's reply runs through both works we hold. No source of knowledge ever shows a thing without features. An ignorance able to hide a consciousness that lights itself has nowhere to reside and no one to belong to. And if every means of knowing is infected with error, the Vedas are infected too, so nothing is left that could remove it. What binds a self, on his account, is karma, the weight of its own past deeds, and that weight is real.

  • ignorance
  • knowledge
  • reality
  • perception
  • epistemology
  • delusion
  • consciousness

One God, and Everything Else His Body

How can there be one ultimate reality and still be real persons and a real world? The answer Rāmānuja gives is the relation of a self to its body, carried up to God.

Brahman, for Rāmānuja, is no bare absolute. It is a personal God, Vishnu, with good qualities beyond number. Selves and matter are real, and they belong to him as a body belongs to the self that lives in it: he supports them, rules them from within, and they exist for his sake. The selves are many, they have no beginning, and they stay distinct from their ruler. So the oneness the Upanishads teach is the oneness of a single being together with all that qualifies it. The school's name says as much: Viśiṣṭādvaita, qualified non-dualism.

  • body-soul relation
  • brahman
  • divine immanence
  • inner controller
  • qualified nondualism
  • divine attributes
  • creation
  • causation
  • self
  • individual self
  • embodiment
  • cosmology
  • divine sovereignty

Scripture as a Way of Knowing

What can be known of God, if neither the eye nor an argument reaches him? Rāmānuja treats the Vedas as a source of knowledge in their own right, and then has to show that all their sentences can be true together.

Perception and inference stop short of God, he holds, so scripture is how God is known. It cannot clash with the senses, because the two speak of different things. That makes philosophy a matter of reading. Some sentences of the Upanishads teach that all is one, and others that God and the selves differ. Rāmānuja refuses to treat one group as the real teaching and the other as a concession. His rule is that a word for a body reaches through to the one who has that body. Read by that rule, 'that you are' names God as the inner self of the hearer, and both groups stand.

  • scriptural authority
  • scriptural interpretation
  • language
  • semantics
  • hermeneutics
  • Vedas
  • scripture

Devotion and Grace

What frees a person: an insight they reach, or a God who answers them? For Rāmānuja release takes two, loving devotion on one side and grace on the other.

Bhakti, loving devotion, is his name for a meditation on God that has become steady and dear to the one who practises it, and he counts it as knowledge, not as a feeling beside knowledge. It is reached by stages, and God answers it with grace. Underneath lies a claim about what a self is: something that exists for God's sake, so that depending on him is its happiness and no humiliation. His followers later taught surrender to God as a path of its own and divided over whether it needs any human effort. Scholars still dispute whether his own works teach it as a separate path.

  • devotion
  • bhakti
  • meditation
  • worship
  • divine grace
  • surrender
  • dependence
  • liberation
  • happiness
  • divine love

Staying in the World: Duty as Worship

Must a person who seeks God leave ordinary life behind? Rāmānuja reads the Gītā as saying no: the work of one's place in life, done without claim to its reward, is where the way begins.

Action binds a self to further births when it is done for what it brings. Done as worship, without claim to the result and without the thought 'I am the doer', the same action clears the way for knowledge of the self and then for devotion. Rāmānuja therefore keeps the duties of a person's station for the whole of life, and he judges an early retreat into contemplation risky for a beginner. Even Krishna's last word to Arjuna, to give up everything and take refuge in him alone, is on his reading no leave to stop doing one's duty.

  • karma yoga
  • duty
  • action
  • renunciation
  • detachment
  • desire
  • ritual
  • sacrifice
  • karma
  • agency
  • rebirth

By the numbers

works held
2
passages traced
1,052
concepts traced
626
thematic clusters
5

Concepts that travel together

The wheel takes the leading concepts of these writings and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “devotion” and “liberation”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 28 pairings. 85 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
devotionliberation45
knowledgeliberation27
liberationself19
brahmanscriptural interpretation18
knowledgeself15
brahmanself14
liberationscriptural authority14
brahmandivine attributes13
brahmanscriptural authority13
devotionknowledge13
divine attributesscriptural interpretation13
devotiondivine attributes10
liberationscriptural interpretation10
brahmanliberation8
divine attributesscriptural authority7
divine attributesknowledge6
scriptural authorityself6
scriptural interpretationself6
brahmanknowledge5
devotionscriptural authority5
devotionself5
divine attributesliberation4
knowledgescriptural authority4
knowledgescriptural interpretation4
brahmandevotion1
devotionscriptural interpretation1
divine attributesself1
scriptural authorityscriptural interpretation1

The arc of a career

A cell's weight is that concept's share of the work's passages, so a column can be read downwards as well as a row across. Densest: scriptural interpretation in Vedārthasaṃgraha, 25.7%.

Density 0% 25.7%

Concept density per work, chronological 2 works, in the order they were written. 8 concept columns, ranked by total weight. 84 further concepts fall outside the columns shown.
WorkYearliberationscriptural interpretationbrahmanknowledgescriptural authoritydevotionselfdivine attributes
Gītā Bhāṣya22.5%1.6%1.9%11.8%5.4%16.9%9.5%3%
Vedārthasaṃgraha9.6%25.7%24.1%10.7%15.7%3.4%10%14.2%

Works held

Titles in your language, the original beneath in brackets; “lit.” marks our own translation where no English edition exists. Side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. Gītā Bhāṣya (Bhagavadgītā-bhāṣya)

    Of the three large works that are securely Rāmānuja's, this one stands closest to worship, with as much praise in it as polemic.

    SA
  2. Vedārthasaṃgraha

    The only free-standing treatise among the three large works that are securely Rāmānuja's; the other two are commentaries. Its title means "Summary of the Meaning of the Vedas", and the Śrībhāṣya, his main commentary, refers back to it repeatedly.

    SA
Begin a dialogue with Rāmānuja

— or wander to another mind

Set two minds against each other

Each of these is a question the two of them answer differently. Choose one and they argue it out, both drawing on the texts held here.