WorkWilliam James

Essays in Radical Empiricism

The book he never wrote: journal papers left for his students, made into a volume two years after his death by the colleague who became his biographer.

by William James185 passages held

English, the original language, and your language

First published: 1912(published posthumously)
Original language: English

Report a rights issue

Overview

A folder of his own reprinted journal articles went into the Harvard library in August 1906, with a second copy left in the philosophy department, so that students who wanted to know what he was doing could go and read it. There were twelve pieces, published across 1904 and 1905, and they were as close as he ever came to the book itself; he died in 1910 without writing it. Two years later Ralph Barton Perry built the volume out of that deposit — ten of the twelve, with two swapped for other pieces, one of which had not existed when James assembled the folder — and gave it the name James had used for the position. That position starts by denying that consciousness is a thing at all. It is not a stuff set over against matter; it is something certain stretches of experience do. What there is, on this account, is experience, unsorted before we sort it, and one and the same piece of it counts as a mind when taken in one set of relations and as a physical object when taken in another. The radical clause is the one about relations. Hume had insisted we experience items and never the joins between them, and the idealists agreed with him and then imported a single all-embracing mind to supply the connections he had removed; James throws out the premise they share. The joins are experienced too — the and, the with, the next-to arrive as directly as the things they hold together — and a world whose connections come with it needs nothing standing outside to hold it up.

Key concepts

What does James mean by pure experience before reflection divides it?

Pure experience means experience before reflection separates it into subject, object, mind, or matter. James uses the phrase for the material from which those distinctions are made, not for a private mental substance hidden behind perception. In the 1904–05 essays, this lets one stretch of experience receive different descriptions without requiring two underlying realities.

What makes James’s empiricism radical, rather than the empiricism of items alone?

Radical empiricism treats experienced relations as part of reality, not as mental additions made after separate sensations arrive. James therefore takes the experienced “and,” “with,” and “next-to” seriously alongside the things they connect. The 1904–05 papers turn that rule into a metaphysical claim: a connected world needs no outside mind to connect it.

What could mind and matter share without becoming one substance?

James answers that both can consist of experience, understood before it has been classified as mental or physical. He does not replace mind and matter with a third hidden substance; he changes the question by showing how one stretch can function as either according to its relations. The 1912 volume gathers the essays that develop this position.

How does James explain knowing without inserting a representation between knower and known?

Knowing need not copy an object into a separate mind; an experience can function as knowing when it enters the appropriate relation to what is known. This avoids treating consciousness as a container holding inner images. In the essays assembled from James’s 1906 Harvard deposit, the knower-known distinction becomes a difference of role within experience, not a division between substances.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Experience and its relations

Can experience include the joins between things, or must a mind add them afterward? James’s answer unsettles the divide between consciousness and matter, and with it the need for a single world-mind.

In papers written in 1904 and 1905, James rejects the premise shared by Hume and the idealists: that experience gives us separate items while a mind must supply their connections. The and, the with, and the next-to belong to experience itself. A single stretch can therefore count as mental or physical according to its relations, while “pure experience” names what exists before those classifications. The consequence is a world that needs no external guarantor.

experience
epistemology
metaphysics
empiricism
consciousness
subjectivity
perception
phenomenology
ontology
dualism
relations
pure experience
reality
monism
pluralism
continuity

Enter a dialogue

Within this work

passages held: 185
distinct concepts: 228
by passages held, corpus-wide: #369

What this book thinks together

The wheel takes this book’s leading concepts and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more of its passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “experience” and “radical empiricism”.

Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 26 pairings. 80 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
Concept	Paired concept	Shared passages
experience	radical empiricism	19
epistemology	pragmatism	13
radical empiricism	relations	12
consciousness	pure experience	11
epistemology	experience	9
epistemology	radical empiricism	8
pure experience	radical empiricism	8
consciousness	radical empiricism	7
experience	pragmatism	7
perception	pure experience	7
experience	perception	6
perception	radical empiricism	6
epistemology	perception	5
consciousness	epistemology	4
experience	relations	4
perception	pragmatism	4
pragmatism	radical empiricism	4
consciousness	perception	3
epistemology	pure experience	3
epistemology	relations	3
pragmatism	pure experience	3
consciousness	relations	2
pure experience	relations	2
consciousness	pragmatism	1
experience	pure experience	1
perception	relations	1

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

1890 The Principles of Psychology
The book American psychology grew up on, and the one everything after it came out of: the chapters on habit, will and belief carry his pragmatism and his radical empiricism in embryo.
EN
1892 Psychology: Briefer Course
For most people who studied psychology in America in the 1890s, this was James: The Principles of Psychology cut down for undergraduate courses two years after it appeared.
EN
1897 The Will to Believe, and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy
Ten years separate this collection from the book that made the label famous: platform lectures on chance, faith and the moral life, gathered the year before he first called himself a pragmatist in public.
EN
1902 The Varieties of Religious Experience
Theologians, mystics and anthropologists have been arguing with this casebook ever since — his only sustained book on religion, and the widest-read thing he wrote. The test it applies to a religious state, judge it by what it does, is the one he would soon be calling pragmatism.
EN
1907 Pragmatism
What the Principles had been carrying since 1890 arrives here as a short public statement, spoken to general audiences in Boston and New York before it was printed. The Meaning of Truth exists because of the way this one was received.
EN
1909 A Pluralistic Universe
Aimed squarely at the absolute idealism then governing philosophy in Britain and America, and the fullest metaphysics he lived to publish. Its technical counterpart is Essays in Radical Empiricism, which nobody assembled until after he was dead.
EN
1909 The Meaning of Truth
The companion to Pragmatism, and mostly older than it: back numbers reprinted alongside fresh answers to its critics. It carries the technical version of the theory of truth that the 1907 lectures had handed to the public.
EN
1912 Essays in Radical Empiricism you are here EN

— or open another of their works