WorkWilliam James

The Varieties of Religious Experience

The Gifford Lectures on natural religion, delayed for years by a damaged heart and then handed over to converts, saints and mystics instead of proofs of God.

by William James600 passages held

  • English, the original language, and your language
First published
(aged 60)
Original language
English

Report a rights issue

Overview

A walk in the Adirondacks in 1898 damaged his heart, and two years of invalidism followed, so Edinburgh — which had invited him to give the Gifford Lectures on natural religion — waited: it was May 1901 before he stood up to begin the first of twenty. Natural religion, as the lectureship had always understood it, meant arguing from the world to God without appeal to revelation and without appeal to anybody's experience. He declined the assignment. What he proposed to study instead was the religious life as individuals actually undergo it in their solitude — conversions, the sudden lifting of despair, saintliness, the mystic's minute of certainty — collected as documents and compared across traditions the way a naturalist compares specimens. Creeds, churches and theologies he treats as second growth, the tidied-up residue of somebody's first-hand experience. That approach requires one defence, and he makes it early: showing that a vision arrived alongside a nervous disorder tells you nothing about whether it is worth having, because every mental state whatever has a bodily cause and the healthy ones are not exempt. Judge these states as you would judge anything — by what they do to the life that has them. It came out from Longmans, Green in June 1902, sold immediately, and has stayed continuously in print for over a century. The method's cost is not hidden. A religion assembled out of solitary experience has no congregation in it, and he said so at the outset rather than letting a reader discover it.

Key concepts

What does James mean by the twice-born?

Twice-born people need a second birth because their first outlook cannot reconcile itself with suffering. James contrasts them with the once-born, who inhabit life through instinctive optimism; the twice-born pass through conversion, often after despair, and discover a religious unity that their earlier consciousness could not supply. The distinction tracks a structure of experience, not a denomination. Despair comes first.

How do healthy-mindedness and the sick soul differ?

Healthy-mindedness treats evil as a limited disturbance and directs attention toward the world's goodness; the sick soul cannot make that exclusion and experiences evil as a fact requiring religious interpretation. James does not simply rank the two temperaments: he presents the second as capable of a deeper reconciliation because it has faced what the first screens out. It appears in their responses to suffering.

How does James identify a genuinely mystical experience?

James identifies mystical experience by four marks: ineffability, a noetic quality, transiency, and passivity. The experience resists ordinary description, carries an authority felt as knowledge, lasts briefly, and arrives with a sense of being received rather than willed. These marks describe the episode's structure, not its theological interpretation. The minute passes, but its consequences may remain.

What are James's over-beliefs, and why does he permit them?

Over-beliefs are religious hypotheses that exceed what experience can prove but guide a person's interpretation of it. James permits them because lived experience leaves practical and metaphysical possibilities open; refusing every belief beyond strict evidence would itself settle questions his method cannot settle. He does not turn private conviction into public proof. An over-belief remains a risk.

Why does James call creeds and theologies second growth?

James calls creeds and theologies second growth because they organize and explain experiences that began in individual religious life. They are not the starting point of his inquiry; conversions, mystical episodes, and saintly conduct come first, while doctrine records what later communities make of them. The phrase reverses theology's usual order. Experience gets priority.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Religion as Lived Experience

The question is whether a religious state earns credibility through doctrine or through the life it produces. The answer determines whether solitary experience can count as evidence without becoming a private refuge from judgment.

James refused the Gifford Lectures’ customary route from nature to God, turning in May 1901 to twenty lectures on conversions, mystical certainty, despair and saintliness as individuals undergo them. He treated creeds and churches as second growth: later arrangements built from first-hand states. A bodily cause does not disqualify a vision, since every mental state has one. The test is practical: judge religious experience by what it does to a life. The cost remains clear. Solitary religion cannot supply a congregation.

  • psychology
  • mysticism
  • epistemology
  • conversion
  • truth
  • theology
  • religion
  • pragmatism
  • asceticism
  • consciousness
  • religious experience
  • subjectivity
  • methodology
  • transformation
  • ethics
  • suffering
  • belief
  • faith
  • subconscious
  • emotion
  • spirituality
  • will
  • perception
  • phenomenology
  • meaning
  • religious psychology

Within this work

passages held
600
distinct concepts
770
by passages held, corpus-wide
#45

What this book thinks together

Every arc around the wheel is one concept in this book. A ribbon joins two the text reaches for together, and its width is how many of its passages hold both. Strongest: pragmatism with truth.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 12 pairings. 128 shared passages in all. 88 weaker pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
pragmatismtruth24
epistemologytruth21
conversionpsychology16
epistemologymysticism14
epistemologypragmatism14
mysticismreligious experience12
epistemologyreligious experience7
conversionreligious experience5
epistemologypsychology5
mysticismtruth4
asceticismmysticism3
asceticismpsychology3

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. 1890 The Principles of Psychology

    The book American psychology grew up on, and the one everything after it came out of: the chapters on habit, will and belief carry his pragmatism and his radical empiricism in embryo.

    EN
  2. 1892 Psychology: Briefer Course

    For most people who studied psychology in America in the 1890s, this was James: The Principles of Psychology cut down for undergraduate courses two years after it appeared.

    EN
  3. 1897 The Will to Believe, and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy

    Ten years separate this collection from the book that made the label famous: platform lectures on chance, faith and the moral life, gathered the year before he first called himself a pragmatist in public.

    EN
  4. 1902 The Varieties of Religious Experience you are here EN
  5. 1907 Pragmatism

    What the Principles had been carrying since 1890 arrives here as a short public statement, spoken to general audiences in Boston and New York before it was printed. The Meaning of Truth exists because of the way this one was received.

    EN
  6. 1909 A Pluralistic Universe

    Aimed squarely at the absolute idealism then governing philosophy in Britain and America, and the fullest metaphysics he lived to publish. Its technical counterpart is Essays in Radical Empiricism, which nobody assembled until after he was dead.

    EN
  7. 1909 The Meaning of Truth

    The companion to Pragmatism, and mostly older than it: back numbers reprinted alongside fresh answers to its critics. It carries the technical version of the theory of truth that the 1907 lectures had handed to the public.

    EN
  8. 1912 Essays in Radical Empiricism

    Radical empiricism is defined here and nowhere in the books he saw through the press: papers written for other philosophers in 1904 and 1905, not talks written for a room.

    EN
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works