Get started

WorkWilliam James

The Meaning of Truth

Fifteen essays bound together to show that the theory of truth in *Pragmatism* was older than *Pragmatism*, and to answer the men who had savaged it.

by William James194 passages held

  • English, the original language, and your language
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work See it in context
First published
(aged 67)
Original language
English

Report a rights issue

Overview

Nine of its fifteen pieces were already in print before Pragmatism existed, and the arrangement is doing work: the volume opens with them, in the order they were published, so the theory of truth is on the page years before the lectures that carried it to the public. The six later pieces are replies, and one chapter is given over entirely to his two English critics, G. E. Moore and Bertrand Russell, who had taken the 1907 lectures to mean that whatever it suits you to believe is thereby true. The book keeps insisting that the workability he has in mind is not comfort. Calling an idea true is a claim about a route: hold it, and it will carry you through experience to the thing it is about, by steps anyone else can walk and check. An idea that merely soothes leads nowhere and fails his test as surely as it fails anyone's. Longmans, Green had it out in 1909, subtitled a sequel to Pragmatism, and the preface says as much plainly. It settled nothing. He died the following August, and Russell went on attacking pragmatism for decades, long after there was anyone left to answer.

Key concepts

What exactly must verification accomplish for an idea to count as true?

Verification is the practical course by which an idea reaches and confirms the reality it concerns. For James, an idea earns the name true when holding it carries thought through experience—by consequences, checks, and connections—rather than when it produces inward conviction. Verification remains open to repetition by other people, not sealed inside one person’s satisfaction.

What does James mean when he says that truth is made in experience?

Truth is something an idea acquires in its dealings with experience, not a label attached to it before those dealings begin. James treats believing as an activity: an idea becomes true as it guides inquiry, connects with other experiences, and meets the reality it intends. Truth therefore has a history, even though it is not arbitrary.

Why does James reject truth as a passive copy of reality?

James rejects a picture of truth as a finished mental duplicate of reality. Ideas can refer to independent things, but they reach those things through attention, inference, and verification. The test is not resemblance inspected from nowhere; it is whether the idea successfully carries inquiry to what it is about. Reality resists wishful thinking.

What does humanism add to James’s account of truth?

James’s humanism makes truth depend on transactions between human thinking and a world that does not simply yield to it. Human purposes help select questions and concepts, while experience can confirm, correct, or defeat the answers. This avoids two extremes: truth as a private invention and truth as a ready-made object copied without the work of knowing.

How does James describe reality without reducing it to private experience?

James treats reality as what ideas must encounter, not as a private creation of the thinker. It includes the things, facts, and relations toward which thought is directed, while experience supplies the tests that show whether thought has reached them. This lets him defend independent reality without pretending that knowing it requires a view outside human activity.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Truth as a Route Through Experience

How can an idea reach reality rather than merely soothe the person who holds it? The answer stakes truth to a route through experience that others can verify, not to private satisfaction.

James treats truth as a claim about what an idea can do in experience, not as a label attached to whatever belief proves comforting. An idea earns the name by carrying its holder, through verifiable steps, to the reality it concerns—a route others can also walk and check. That standard drives the volume’s fifteen essays: nine predate the 1907 lectures, while six answer critics such as G. E. Moore and Bertrand Russell, who read pragmatism as permission to believe whatever suited them. Workability means passage, not consolation.

  • truth
  • pragmatism
  • experience
  • verification
  • reality
  • knowledge
  • cognition
  • meaning
  • epistemology

Enter a dialogue

Within this work

passages held
194
distinct concepts
251
by passages held, corpus-wide
#138

What this book thinks together

Every arc around the wheel is one concept in this book. A ribbon joins two the text reaches for together, and its width is how many of its passages hold both. Strongest: pragmatism with truth.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 18 pairings. 151 shared passages in all. 82 weaker pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
pragmatismtruth19
cognitionepistemology16
epistemologytruth16
epistemologypragmatism15
epistemologyexperience10
humanismtruth9
experiencetruth8
pragmatismverification8
cognitionverification7
epistemologyhumanism7
epistemologyverification7
cognitionpragmatism5
humanismpragmatism5
truthverification5
cognitionexperience4
experiencehumanism4
experiencepragmatism4
cognitiontruth2

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. 1890 The Principles of Psychology

    The book American psychology grew up on, and the one everything after it came out of: the chapters on habit, will and belief carry his pragmatism and his radical empiricism in embryo.

     EN
  2. 1892 Psychology: Briefer Course

    For most people who studied psychology in America in the 1890s, this was James: The Principles of Psychology cut down for undergraduate courses two years after it appeared.

     EN
  3. 1897 The Will to Believe, and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy

    Ten years separate this collection from the book that made the label famous: platform lectures on chance, faith and the moral life, gathered the year before he first called himself a pragmatist in public.

     EN
  4. 1902 The Varieties of Religious Experience

    Theologians, mystics and anthropologists have been arguing with this casebook ever since — his only sustained book on religion, and the widest-read thing he wrote. The test it applies to a religious state, judge it by what it does, is the one he would soon be calling pragmatism.

     EN
  5. 1907 Pragmatism

    What the Principles had been carrying since 1890 arrives here as a short public statement, spoken to general audiences in Boston and New York before it was printed. The Meaning of Truth exists because of the way this one was received.

     EN
  6. 1909 A Pluralistic Universe

    Aimed squarely at the absolute idealism then governing philosophy in Britain and America, and the fullest metaphysics he lived to publish. Its technical counterpart is Essays in Radical Empiricism, which nobody assembled until after he was dead.

     EN
  7. 1909 The Meaning of Truth you are here EN
  8. 1912 Essays in Radical Empiricism

    Radical empiricism is defined here and nowhere in the books he saw through the press: papers written for other philosophers in 1904 and 1905, not talks written for a room.

     EN
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works