WorkWilliam James

The Principles of Psychology

Commissioned as a textbook, delivered twelve years late in two volumes, and posted off by an author who called the result a failure.

by William James1,943 passages held

  • English, the original language, and your language
First published
(aged 48)
Original language
English

Report a rights issue

Overview

Henry Holt commissioned a psychology textbook in 1878 and waited twelve years for it. What arrived in 1890 was two volumes, eleven of whose twenty-eight chapters had already gone out as journal articles while the rest kept growing, and James sent it off with a verdict attached: a bloated, dropsical mass, he told his publisher, proving only that there is no such thing as a science of psychology and that its author was incapable. The argument inside is that the psychology of the day had begun in the wrong place. Associationists after Hume treated the mind as a compound of elementary sensations, and the new German laboratories were busy timing and measuring those elements. James says there are no elements. What introspection actually meets is a stream — continuous, never presenting the same state twice, always selecting, and always somebody's rather than nobody's. Around that he builds the chapters the book is still opened for: habit, which does most of what we call character and leaves a fold that never quite comes out; the self, which can be listed and described and is nevertheless the thing doing the listing; and the proposal that we do not weep because we are sad but are sad because we weep, the bodily change arriving first and the emotion being our reading of it. It became a touchstone for students on both sides of the Atlantic almost at once. Wundt, whose laboratory it had walked past, is remembered for granting that it was beautiful and denying that it was psychology.

Key concepts

What does James mean when he says habits form a person’s character?

For James, a habit is an acquired nervous disposition that makes a repeated act easier, more automatic, and less available to conscious choice. It does not merely save effort: it builds the practical shape of character. Because repetition fixes pathways, education and self-command must work by establishing competing routines, not by issuing isolated resolutions.

What is the fringe of consciousness, and why does it matter?

The fringe is the dimly felt context surrounding the sharply attended part of thought. It carries relations, anticipations, and a sense of direction that no inventory of discrete sensations can capture. A word may arrive with its “fringe” of possible meanings; that fringe helps the mind move from one thought to the next without consciously spelling out every connection.

What are the substantive and transitive parts of thought?

James divides thought into substantive and transitive parts: substantive moments pause on an object, while transitive moments pass between objects and carry the movement of thinking. The distinction explains why introspection often distorts consciousness: attention tends to seize the stable nouns and miss the relations, tendencies, and transitions that make a thought a process.

How does James distinguish instinct from reflex and deliberate reasoning?

James treats instinct as an inherited capacity to notice and respond to particular objects, not as a mindless reflex with no felt or practical direction. Human beings possess many instincts, and learning does not simply replace them; it organizes, inhibits, and redirects them. This lets psychology explain conduct without reducing it either to reason or to habit.

What are James’s material, social, and spiritual selves, and why separate them?

James divides the known self into material, social, and spiritual selves. The material self includes the body and possessions; the social self consists in the selves recognized by particular people; the spiritual self names inner capacities and activity. The division shows why personal identity cannot be reduced to a single substance: a person encounters a plurality of selves, while the knowing subject remains distinct from what it knows.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

The continuous stream of experience

Can psychology measure experience without first breaking it into pieces, when consciousness selects and belongs to someone? That changes what counts as evidence.

Psychology must start with what experience presents, not with sensations invented by analysis. James rejects fragments. Against Humean associationism and the German laboratories’ timed elements, he describes consciousness as a continuous stream: it selects, belongs to a subject, and changes what follows. Habit explains how repeated action acquires force; the self remains both the object described and the agent describing it. In 1890, two volumes made that case at textbook scale. Emotion followed bodily change, not vice versa.

  • perception
  • consciousness
  • cognition
  • sensation
  • attention
  • physiology
  • habit
  • memory
  • instinct
  • emotion
  • volition
  • identity
  • subjectivity
  • self
  • associationism
  • association
  • neurophysiology
  • phenomenology

Within this work

passages held
1,943
distinct concepts
1,513
by passages held, corpus-wide
#9

What this book thinks together

Every arc around the wheel is one concept in this book. A ribbon joins two the text reaches for together, and its width is how many of its passages hold both. Strongest: perception with sensation.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 22 pairings. 565 shared passages in all. 78 weaker pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
perceptionsensation74
cognitionperception67
attentionperception55
consciousnessperception49
attentionconsciousness40
consciousnesssensation35
attentioncognition22
epistemologyperception22
consciousnessmemory20
attentionsensation19
consciousnesspsychology19
perceptionpsychology19
cognitionconsciousness16
consciousnessepistemology15
epistemologysensation15
cognitionsensation14
cognitionpsychology13
memoryperception13
cognitionepistemology12
attentionmemory9
cognitionmemory9
epistemologypsychology8

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. 1890 The Principles of Psychology you are here EN
  2. 1892 Psychology: Briefer Course

    For most people who studied psychology in America in the 1890s, this was James: The Principles of Psychology cut down for undergraduate courses two years after it appeared.

    EN
  3. 1897 The Will to Believe, and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy

    Ten years separate this collection from the book that made the label famous: platform lectures on chance, faith and the moral life, gathered the year before he first called himself a pragmatist in public.

    EN
  4. 1902 The Varieties of Religious Experience

    Theologians, mystics and anthropologists have been arguing with this casebook ever since — his only sustained book on religion, and the widest-read thing he wrote. The test it applies to a religious state, judge it by what it does, is the one he would soon be calling pragmatism.

    EN
  5. 1907 Pragmatism

    What the Principles had been carrying since 1890 arrives here as a short public statement, spoken to general audiences in Boston and New York before it was printed. The Meaning of Truth exists because of the way this one was received.

    EN
  6. 1909 A Pluralistic Universe

    Aimed squarely at the absolute idealism then governing philosophy in Britain and America, and the fullest metaphysics he lived to publish. Its technical counterpart is Essays in Radical Empiricism, which nobody assembled until after he was dead.

    EN
  7. 1909 The Meaning of Truth

    The companion to Pragmatism, and mostly older than it: back numbers reprinted alongside fresh answers to its critics. It carries the technical version of the theory of truth that the 1907 lectures had handed to the public.

    EN
  8. 1912 Essays in Radical Empiricism

    Radical empiricism is defined here and nowhere in the books he saw through the press: papers written for other philosophers in 1904 and 1905, not talks written for a room.

    EN
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works