Why the Richest Nations Have the Most Paupers
Why did England, the richest country in Europe, have so many more people on relief than poor Portugal? Tocqueville's answer is that progress itself multiplies needs.
In 1833 Tocqueville found about one person in six in England living on poor relief, while countries that looked wretched had few dependents. The puzzle dissolves once poverty is measured against need. Industry puts more people on wages that can vanish in a bad year, and comforts that were once luxuries become necessities whose loss counts as poverty. Civilisation raises the floor of what a person must have, and with it the number of people who can fall below it.
- poverty
- industrialization
- civilization
- labor
- social class
- social progress
- needs
- human needs
- social inequality
- agriculture
Enter a dialogue
- A Native American in his smoky hut pitied our arts and did not find his own lot cruel, you saw. What does that show about what people need?
- Why can a family with far more than its grandparents had still count itself poor?
- In the Middle Ages comfort was nowhere but bare living was everywhere. Why does a richer society still keep a minority one step from dying of want?
- If progress multiplies need, shouldn't a nation that cares about the poor be wary of progress itself?
- Doesn't counting paupers on relief measure the generosity of a law rather than the extent of poverty?