A Right to Work, and the State It Would Need
What would a state have to be to guarantee every citizen a job? Tocqueville told the Assembly that only a state owning and directing all labour could keep such a promise.
The provisional government proclaimed the right to work the day after the monarchy fell, and the National Workshops opened and closed within months. When a deputy moved on 12 September 1848 to put the right back into the constitution, Tocqueville answered that such a promise could be kept only by a state that owned and directed all labour, and that such a state leads to socialism. He did not reject public assistance: he asked for Christian charity to be carried further into public policy, as charity and never as a right.
- right to work
- state intervention
- state power
- labor
- private property
- property
- ownership
- paternalism
- charity
- christianity and politics
- poverty
Enter a dialogue
- A right to work, you argued, forces the state either to employ everyone itself or to run wages and production. Why does each road end in socialism?
- What does a man out of work have a right to ask of his country?
- The French Revolution believed a brave, honest person needs only knowledge and liberty, nothing more from the government. Is that enough for someone out of work?
- Why is a promise of work more dangerous than a promise of assistance, if both cost money?
- After the Paris workers' rising of June 1848, wasn't refusing them a right to work bound to invite another?