WorkBoethius

How Substances Can Be Good In Virtue of Their Existence Without Being Absolute Goods

How can a thing be good just by existing, when goodness itself is God and the thing is not? Boethius answers it in axioms, like geometry.

by Boethius7 passages held

English, a translation held here, and your language

Original title: Quomodo substantiae in eo quod sint bonae sint cum non sint substantialia bona
First published: 520(aged 43)
Original language: Latin

Report a rights issue

Overview

The question this short tractate answers is a genuine puzzle, and Boethius poses it exactly: how can created things be good simply by existing, when goodness itself is God, and they plainly are not God? To answer it he does something unusual for a theological piece — he begins by laying down a set of axioms, common notions he asks the reader to grant as one grants them in geometry, and reasons from them step by step. The resolution turns on a distinction he draws sharply: the first good is good through its own being, while everything else is good by participation, good because its very existence flows from that first good and would be nothing without it. The method — theology conducted as a chain of proofs from stated axioms — mattered as much as the conclusion. Thomas Aquinas thought the tractate worth a full commentary of his own, taking up its problem seven centuries later and pushing the analysis further.

Key concepts

What puzzle does this tractate set out to solve?

How created things can be good simply by existing, when goodness itself is God and they are not God. If a thing is good just by being, and to be good is to be God, then each thing would seem to be God, which is absurd. Boethius poses the problem sharply and devotes the piece to resolving it without either denying creatures their goodness or making them divine.

What is the difference between the first good and other goods?

The first good, God, is good through its own being; its goodness and its existence are one. Everything else is good by participation: a created thing is good because its very existence derives from that first good and would be nothing apart from it. So creatures are genuinely good, but their goodness is received and dependent, never their own in the way God's is.

Why does Boethius argue from axioms like a geometer?

He opens by laying down common notions, self-evident principles he asks the reader to grant just as one grants axioms in geometry, and then reasons from them step by step to his conclusion. It is an unusual method for a theological work, and the point is rigour: a demonstration built from stated first principles rather than from scripture or authority. The method proved as influential as the conclusion.

Why is this tractate important despite its brevity?

It is the most purely philosophical of Boethius's theological pieces, arguing from reason alone rather than revelation, and its account of goodness by participation fed directly into medieval metaphysics. Its importance is measured by its readers: Thomas Aquinas took up its problem seven centuries later and wrote a full commentary on it, pushing the analysis of participation and being further still.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Good simply by existing

How can created things be good just by being, when goodness itself is God and they plainly are not God? Boethius answers the puzzle in axioms, reasoning like a geometer.

Boethius poses the puzzle sharply: if a thing is good merely by existing, and goodness itself is God, each existing thing would seem to be God, which is absurd. Unusually for a theological piece, he lays down common notions, axioms he asks the reader to grant as in geometry, and reasons step by step. The resolution turns on a distinction. The first good is good through its own being; everything else is good by participation, good because its existence flows from that first good, and nothing without it. The method mattered as much as the answer, and Aquinas thought it worth a full commentary of his own.

goodness
participation
substance
being
teleology
divine simplicity
metaphysics
causation
action

Enter a dialogue

Within this work

passages held: 7
distinct concepts: 23
by passages held, corpus-wide: #289

What this book thinks together

Every arc around the wheel is one concept in this book. A ribbon joins two the text reaches for together, and its width is how many of its passages hold both. Strongest: goodness with participation.

Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 3 concepts, joined by 2 pairings. 4 shared passages in all.
Concept	Paired concept	Shared passages
goodness	participation	2
goodness	substance	2

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

512 A Treatise Against Eutyches and Nestorius (Contra Eutychen et Nestorium)
Aimed at two opposite Christological heresies, this short tractate is remembered less for the quarrel that occasioned it than for a definition of person that medieval thought adopted as standard.
LAEN
520 How Substances Can Be Good In Virtue of Their Existence Without Being Absolute Goods (Quomodo substantiae in eo quod sint bonae sint cum non sint substantialia bona) you are here LAEN
520 On the Catholic Faith (De Fide Catholica)
Doubted for centuries and restored to the set on the strength of its manuscript transmission and style, this is a plain confession of faith rather than one of the logical tractates.
LAEN
520 The Trinity (De Trinitate)
Prompted by a sixth-century controversy over the Trinity, it brings the Aristotelian logic Boethius spent his life translating to bear on the doctrine, and drew close attention from later medieval schools.
LAEN
524 The Consolation of Philosophy (De Consolatione Philosophiae)
Written in prison as Boethius awaited execution, this dialogue of alternating prose and verse became the most widely read book of the Latin Middle Ages after the Bible, translated by kings and poets for a thousand years.
LAEN

— or open another of their works