The faith stated plainly, without the logic
What does the Christian story look like told straight through, with none of the argument? Boethius sets out the content of belief, from creation and the fall to the church, as a confession rather than a proof.
Long doubted to be his, it carries none of the logical machinery that marks the others, no axioms, no analysis of terms, no named opponent, but runs plainly through the arc of Christian belief: creation, the fall, the long history of God's dealings, the incarnation, redemption and the church. Its very plainness raised the suspicion of a different hand; an early catalogue of his writings names the other tractates and pointedly not this one. Its return to the set rests on the manuscript tradition and the judgement that the style is his. It is a statement of belief, not one of the arguments on which his reputation rests.
- grace
- creation
- incarnation
- salvation
- resurrection
- original sin
- history
- salvation history
- prophecy
- virgin birth
- allegory
Enter a dialogue
- For a person who can follow the whole Christian story yet feels no argument compels it, what does a plain confession like this ask of them?
- Everywhere else you insist a doctrine holds only if its terms are pinned down; why here set out belief with no argument at all?
- How does simply confessing the faith, creation through the church, differ from demonstrating it the way your other tractates try to?
- To take the whole arc from the fall to redemption as a story to be received rather than proved, what does a reasoning mind have to set down?
- Readers have doubted for centuries that this bare statement is even yours; does a confession of faith need to bear a philosopher's mark to be worth writing?