Get started

WorkBoethius

The Consolation of Philosophy

Condemned to death and awaiting execution, Boethius stages Philosophy visiting his cell — and consoles himself, a Christian, without once naming Christ.

by Boethius139 passages held

  • English, a translation held here, and your language
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work See it in context
Original title
De Consolatione Philosophiae
First published
(aged 44)
Original language
Latin

Report a rights issue

Overview

In a cell, waiting to die, Boethius wrote this book. He had risen to consul and chief minister under Theodoric, the Ostrogothic king of Italy, and around 523 he was accused of treason, stripped of everything, and imprisoned at Pavia to await an execution that came within a year or two. In prison he staged a dialogue: a woman who is Philosophy herself enters his cell, finds him sunk in self-pity and dictating his griefs to the Muses of poetry, and sets about arguing him out of despair. She works through the questions his situation forces — why fortune gives and takes without desert, why the wicked prosper and the good suffer, whether anything a man can lose was ever truly his, how divine foreknowledge can leave human choice free. The form is as deliberate as the argument: prose and verse alternate throughout, reasoning giving way to song and back again. One fact has drawn comment ever since — Boethius was a Christian writing under sentence of death, and Christ is never named in it; the consolation offered is entirely the work of reason. The book then had an afterlife almost without equal. Through the thousand years after his death it was among the most read works in the Latin West, and kings and poets translated it to prove their own wisdom — Alfred the Great, Jean de Meun, Chaucer, and Elizabeth I, who turned it into English in 1593.

Key concepts

What are the circumstances in which Boethius wrote the Consolation?

In prison, awaiting execution. Having risen to consul and chief minister under Theodoric, the Ostrogothic king of Italy, Boethius was accused of treason around 523, stripped of everything and jailed at Pavia. He wrote the book in his cell before an execution that came within a year or two. That setting, a condemned man consoling himself, is inseparable from the argument the book makes about fortune and loss.

Who is Lady Philosophy?

The figure who enters Boethius's cell as the book opens: a woman of grave majesty who personifies philosophy itself. She finds him sunk in self-pity, dictating his griefs to the Muses of poetry, drives them out, and takes over as his physician and interlocutor. The whole work is a dialogue between the two, in which she diagnoses his despair and argues him step by step back toward the truths he had forgotten.

What is the wheel of Fortune?

Boethius's image, voiced by Fortune herself, for the way worldly goods come and go. Fortune turns a wheel that raises some and casts down others by its own nature, without regard to merit, and the goods she distributes, wealth, rank, fame, are only lent. To accept her gifts is to accept her turning. The image became one of the most enduring in medieval thought, a standing emblem of instability.

How does Boethius reconcile divine foreknowledge with free will?

By distinguishing God's knowing from ours. God does not foresee events one after another in time but sees all things at once in an eternal present. Since God's knowledge is not before the act but simultaneous with it, in eternity, it no more compels a free choice than a bystander's watching compels what he sees happening. Foreknowledge, rightly understood as eternal vision, leaves human freedom intact.

Why does Boethius never mention Christ in the Consolation?

It is the fact most remarked on about the book. Boethius was a Christian writing under sentence of death, yet the consolation Philosophy offers is entirely the work of reason, and Christ is never named. Whatever his motive, the omission made the work readable across the whole Latin Middle Ages as a book of philosophical, not doctrinal, consolation, and it became among the most read and translated works after the Bible.

Themes of the book

What this book returns to, gathered into themes and ordered by how much of the text each one occupies.

Fortune, and what was never yours

When everything is stripped away at once, was any of it ever truly a person's own? Philosophy answers Boethius's ruin by asking what a man can lose that fortune did not merely lend.

Philosophy enters the condemned man's cell and finds him mourning lost rank, wealth and reputation. Her first move is to give Fortune her own voice: the goods you grieve were mine, lent not given, and I take back only what was always mine to take. Her wheel turns by nature, raising and casting down without regard to desert, so a person who trusted her had already agreed to her terms. Nothing fortune bestows can be truly one's own, because what can be taken against one's will was never securely held. The consolation begins not by restoring the losses but by showing they were never possessions in the first place.

  • fortune
  • fame
  • wealth
  • power
  • adversity
  • desire
  • vice

Enter a dialogue

Where real happiness actually lies

Everyone pursues happiness, yet almost everyone seeks it where it cannot be found. Philosophy argues that the true good is one, and every lesser prize a broken piece of it.

All people seek happiness, Philosophy argues, but scatter the pursuit across wealth, honour, power, fame and pleasure, each a fragment mistaken for the whole. The true good is single and complete, lacking nothing, and the partial goods are counterfeits that leave the desire they promised to fill still open. That complete good, she reasons, is God, and to reach it is to become godlike by participation. Because the good and the one are the same, whatever loses its unity loses its being and worth. Happiness cannot be won by accumulating the world's prizes, only by turning toward the single good from which each borrows its whole attraction.

  • happiness
  • goodness
  • virtue
  • unity
  • teleology
  • desire
  • wisdom

Enter a dialogue

Why the wicked prosper, and how choice stays free

If a good God governs all, why do the wicked flourish and the good suffer, and if God foresees everything, how can any choice be free? Philosophy meets both questions head-on.

The hardest section turns to providence. The wicked, Philosophy argues, are in truth always the losers, powerless to reach the good they aim at and punished by the very vice they choose, while the good never finally lose. What looks like fortune's disorder is a providence whose reasons we cannot see from within time. Then the sharpest puzzle: if God foreknows every act, is it not fixed? Her answer separates God's knowing from ours. God does not foresee in time but sees all things at once in an eternal present, and such knowledge no more compels our choices than a spectator's watching compels what he watches.

  • providence
  • free will
  • necessity
  • evil
  • theodicy
  • justice
  • eternity
  • order

Enter a dialogue

Within this work

passages held
139
distinct concepts
265
by passages held, corpus-wide
#433

What this book thinks together

The wheel takes this book’s leading concepts and shows how often they come up together. The wider the band between two, the more of its passages speak of both. Among them, most often together: “happiness” and “virtue”.
Concept co-occurrence, strongest first 8 concepts, joined by 18 pairings. 87 pairings reach beyond these concepts and are not drawn.
ConceptPaired conceptShared passages
happinessvirtue5
divine providencefortune4
divine providencejustice4
fortunehappiness4
fortunevirtue4
happinesswealth4
divine providencefree will3
divine providencevirtue3
happinessjustice3
justicevirtue3
reasonvirtue3
virtuewealth3
divine providencereason2
fortunewealth2
fortunereason1
free willreason1
happinessreason1
justicewealth1

Works held

The author's work in order, this book marked in place. Your-language title first, the original beneath it where the two differ; side chips show which full texts are held.

  1. 512 A Treatise Against Eutyches and Nestorius (Contra Eutychen et Nestorium)

    Aimed at two opposite Christological heresies, this short tractate is remembered less for the quarrel that occasioned it than for a definition of person that medieval thought adopted as standard.

     EN
  2. 520 How Substances Can Be Good In Virtue of Their Existence Without Being Absolute Goods (Quomodo substantiae in eo quod sint bonae sint cum non sint substantialia bona)

    Argued from stated axioms rather than scripture, this is the most purely philosophical of Boethius's theological tractates, and important enough that Aquinas later wrote a commentary on it.

     EN
  3. 520 On the Catholic Faith (De Fide Catholica)

    Doubted for centuries and restored to the set on the strength of its manuscript transmission and style, this is a plain confession of faith rather than one of the logical tractates.

     EN
  4. 520 The Trinity (De Trinitate)

    Prompted by a sixth-century controversy over the Trinity, it brings the Aristotelian logic Boethius spent his life translating to bear on the doctrine, and drew close attention from later medieval schools.

     EN
  5. 524 The Consolation of Philosophy (De Consolatione Philosophiae) you are here EN
Sign in or subscribe to discuss this work

— or open another of their works