Older and Holier Than Celibacy
Should a young man who alone can carry on his family choose a wife or the cloister? The letter argues for marriage so strongly that theologians heard in it an attack on celibacy itself.
Marriage was founded not by Lycurgus, Moses or Solon but by God himself in paradise, and Christ honoured it at a wedding feast. Nature agrees: every living kind, even trees, shows something like marriage, and through children a mortal makes himself almost immortal. Scripture praises an honourable marriage and an undefiled bed and never so much as names celibacy. A man who received life from his ancestors owes it to his descendants, so refusing marriage for holiness' sake treats as profane what God made holy.
- marriage
- procreation
- celibacy
- nature
- family
- natural law
- mortality
- scripture
Enter a dialogue
- Marriage, you argue, was founded not by Lycurgus, Moses or Solon but by God in paradise. Why should its age make it holier than celibacy?
- Through children, you write, a mortal makes himself almost immortal. Is that a Christian reason to marry, or an old pagan hope?
- Dumb animals obey nature's law and multiply, you note, while people refuse it like the giants who fought the gods. Who are these rebels?
- Scripture honours the marriage bed, you point out, and never even names celibacy. How do you answer theologians who call virginity the higher state?