Learning and Its Pious Enemies
Is pagan literature a danger to Christian faith? Friends gathered at a country house away from the plague take up the question, and Jacob Batt turns it into a charge against those who ask it.
The enemies of good letters, Batt argues, are not unbelievers but men inside the Church: monks and schoolmasters who mask their laziness with the honest name of religion, since no shade covers sloth better. Compare the modesty and learning of the ancients with the arrogance and ignorance of the present, he says, and you would flee to the ends of the earth. Jerome kept his Cicero and Plato and used them everywhere; whatever the ancients did and said well was prepared by Christ for Christians to use.
- education
- classical learning
- ignorance
- anti-intellectualism
- religion
- hypocrisy
- intellectual humility
- humanism
- christianity
Enter a dialogue
- No shade, your speaker says, hides sloth better than the honest name of religion. How can anyone tell genuine simplicity from laziness passing as piety?
- Pious critics say pagan poets corrupt Christian readers. Why does your friend Jacob Batt insist that whatever the ancients said well, Christ prepared for Christians?
- A believer is afraid that reading secular books will weaken her faith. What does Jerome, who kept his Cicero and Plato all his life, say to her fear?
- Your friend Jacob Batt contrasts ancient modesty with the arrogance of his age and longs to flee to the ends of the earth. Can learning cure pride?