King or Tyrant
What separates a ruler from a tyrant when both wear the same crown? Erasmus answers that it is whose good he serves, and that the answer is decided long before he takes the throne.
A king delights in his citizens' liberty; a tyrant wants to be feared, and nothing alarms him like good citizens agreeing with one another. Since a prince cannot be chosen, he must be made: a tutor from the cradle, flatterers kept away, the fable of the blinded Cyclops told as a warning about strength without sight. Erasmus borrows Plato's hope that philosophers should rule, but his philosopher is no logician, only someone who sees through false goods and follows the true ones.
- tyranny
- political legitimacy
- common good
- kingship
- political authority
- justice
- flattery
- political education
Enter a dialogue
- Fear seems a firmer grip on unruly subjects than love. Why do you insist the tyrant wants to be feared and the true king to be loved?
- A tyrant, you observe, fears nothing so much as good citizens agreeing with one another. Why would a ruler dread his people's harmony?
- Whoever forges a prince's coin is put to death. Why does someone who corrupts a prince's mind with flattery deserve worse, in your view?
- Under a gambling prince, you note, everyone plays dice, and under a warlike one everyone longs to fight. What follows for anyone set over others?