The Will to Power, Built by Others
The notebooks toward an abandoned project, arranged by other hands into a book that looks finished. Under the famous title run the late preoccupations, will to power, the revaluation of values, the coming of nihilism, but the architecture is the editors', not his.
Nietzsche planned a major work called The Will to Power in the 1880s, filled notebooks toward it, then dropped the scheme. After his collapse his sister and the editor Peter Gast selected discarded fragments, numbered them, and issued the result as his crowning system, 483 sections in 1901 and 1,067 by 1906. Colli and Montinari later showed how far the compilation departed from the manuscripts and called it a construction. The genuine ideas are here in raw form: force read as will to power, truth as perspective, morality as decadence. What is not his is the claim that they form a system, or that this was his last word.
- will to power
- power
- nihilism
- morality
- metaphysics
- values
- value theory
- perspectivism
- decadence
- epistemology
Enter a dialogue
- What should a reader do with ideas dressed as a finished system their author never assembled?
- Does it matter that your sister arranged these fragments, if the thoughts inside them are genuinely yours?
- What gets falsified when discarded notes are numbered and issued as a crowning system their writer had abandoned?
- How do we tell the late ideas you truly worked out from the shape your editors imposed afterward?
- Someone treats this volume as your last and highest word — what would you warn them they are trusting?