A Human History of Morality and Art
Not whether morality, religion and art are true, but how they came to be, and the answer finds low, ordinary origins where tradition saw the eternal. Applied like a chemist's method, the question dissolves the aura around everything the age most revered.
In place of his first book's grand metaphysics, Nietzsche adopts Paul Ree's cool, naturalistic account of morality's descent and turns it on the higher things at large. Short aphorisms trace religion, morals and art back to vanity, self-deception and the small mechanics of social life, asking after origin rather than truth. The aim is deflation: what looked eternal turns out to have a merely human genealogy. Dedicated to Voltaire on the centenary of his death, the method plants a flag in the Enlightenment camp and sets loose the suspicion the later books would harden into a system.
- psychology
- human nature
- morality
- ethics
- self-deception
- vanity
- social psychology
- cultural evolution
- secularism
- resentment
Enter a dialogue
- Someone holds their moral and artistic ideals as sacred — what happens when you trace them to low, human origins?
- Does showing that morality grew from vanity and self-deception really prove it false, or just explain how it arose?
- What is surrendered when the aura around religion, morality and art dissolves into a merely human genealogy?
- How is asking where a value came from different from asking whether that value is actually true?
- Turning this method on one's own heart — could anyone do it without going cold to what they love?