The Prejudices of Morality
We keep morality without ever having understood what it is or why. Beneath the feeling of obligation lies neither reason nor divine command but the sheer weight of inherited custom, obedience to tradition wearing the mask of conscience.
Subtitled Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality and composed in Genoa across 1880 and 1881, the book opens Nietzsche's long campaign without once preaching immorality. Its stranger claim is that moral feelings are symptoms of older, buried drives, not windows onto a moral order, and that what we obey as conscience is at bottom the morality of custom. Hundreds of numbered aphorisms build the case by accumulation, through irony and parody rather than proof. Barely read in its day, it is the exact engine that would drive Beyond Good and Evil and, above all, the Genealogy a few years later.
- morality
- ethics
- virtue
- authority
- resentment
- self-deception
- psychology
- character
Enter a dialogue
- Someone acts from a clear conscience and calls it moral — what is really moving them underneath?
- Isn't at least some of what we call conscience genuine reason or compassion, not the dead weight of custom?
- What does a person lose when they can no longer trust their moral feelings as windows onto any moral order?
- How is obeying inherited custom different from choosing a value one has actually examined and understood?
- Can a person keep living by a morality once they see it was never reasoned, only handed down and obeyed?