Capitalism as Revolutionary Force
What if the system that must be overthrown is also the most transforming power history has known? Readers are asked to marvel at capitalism's reach before being told to end it.
Reading all history as class struggle, Marx and Engels reserve their most startling pages for praise: the bourgeoisie has torn up every old certainty, revolutionised production, and hauled every nation into a single market — and in doing so bred the workers who will end it. Recurrent crisis marks the limit of that expansion. Commissioned by a league of exiles as revolution neared in 1848, the pamphlet closes by calling the workers of all countries to combine, and went on to become one of the most widely printed political texts ever written.
- capital
- class struggle
- capitalism
- ideology
- proletariat
- revolution
- historical materialism
Enter a dialogue
- Earlier classes of producers lived by keeping the old ways of production unchanged. Why can the bourgeoisie, the owners of capital, exist only by revolutionizing production constantly?
- Modern society is like a sorcerer who can no longer control the underworld powers he conjured. Which powers have slipped out of his hands?
- Doctors, lawyers, priests and poets now work for wages like anyone else, their halo gone. Is that, for you, a loss or the truth finally seen?
- Workers have nothing to lose but their chains, the pamphlet ends. Yet it credits capitalism with railways and steamships. Would ending capitalism not lose those too?
- How is your call to overthrow capitalism different from the reactionaries who also hated it but wanted the old world back?